THE session of 1841 was
the last occasion on which Sir John Harvey met the Provincial
legislature. Great changes had taken place in the condition of the
Province during the year that had elapsed since the last meeting. There
had been much commercial embarassment due to losses by fire, and bad
markets in England for the staple products of the colonies. But the
country had enjoyed the advantage of a good harvest, and that
compensated in part for the commercial depression. He was able to
announce that arrangements were being made for the improvement of the
postal communication in British America, and the reduction of the rates
of postage. The post office at that time was an Imperial institution,
and the postal facilities of the Province were on a very limited scale,
in comparison with those of the present day, The postage on letters was
so high that it cost seven pence to send a letter from St. John to
Fredericton, and a shilling to send one to Richibucto. The postage from
St. John to Dorchester, was nine pence, and the same rate took a letter
to Halifax. But it cost one shilling and three pence, to send a letter
to Dalhousie, one shilling and six pence, to send a letter from St. John
to Quebec, and one shilling and eight pence to forward it to Montreal.
These excessive rates of postage existed until the year 1850, when the
post office department was transferred to the Provincial Government. A
curious light is thrown on these high rates of postage by some
correspondence which passed between the post office authorities and the
Government of New Brunswick in the year 1843 in regard to the postage
charged on certain public documents which had been forwarded to the
Government of this Province from Nova Scotia and Prince Edward Island. A
copy of tbe laws of Prince Edward Island, which had been sent from
Charlotte-town for the use of the Provincial government, was charged £34
16s. 8d. postage, upon which the Provincial authorities here refused to
take it out of the post office, and a long correspondence ensued in
regard to it. The packet in which the law book was contained being
closed, it was subject to letter postage, and the Postmaster-General or
his deputy, was unable to reduce the rate, so that the book in question
probably never reached its destination. It is impossible to exaggerate
the inconvenience which must have resulted from such excessive rates of
postage. Nor was this the only evil from which the Province suffered in
connection with the post office department. Mails, which now go daily,
or twice or three times a week, at that time seldom went oftener than
once a week, and these mails were usually so small that a courier, on
horseback, was able to carry them with him. Those who had friends at a
distance seldom resorted to the post office for the purpose of
communicating with them, and depended on sending letters by private
hand, when some casual traveller journeyed between the places. The same
difficulty, with regard to postage, retarded the circulation of
newspapers, and prevented the transmission of intelligence throughout
the country. The reduced scale of duties, to which the
Lieutenant-Governor referred, did not apply to internal colonial
postage, but to the transmission of letters from Great Britain to
British North America. Heretofore the rate on a single letter had
amounted frequently to three or four shillings, a sum much greater than
most people were able to pay, and which discouraged correspondence
between immigrants and their friends in Great Britain. The new rate was
one shilling and three pence, which, although we should consider very
high at the present time, was then looked upon as a great boon. The
Province had yet to wait for a long time for a really low rate of
postage between Great Britain and the colonies, and the present two
cent, rate was something of which the wildest imagination at that time,
had never dreamed.
The most important act
of 1841, was a measure to establish a Provincial House of Correction.
The need of this had been forced on the attention of the Legislature by
the bad condition of the gaok of the Province. Two of the judges,
Botsford and Parker, had been requested by Sir John Harvey, in 1839, to
inspect the St. John gaol, and they found the building entirely too
small for the needs of the city, and the proper care of the prisoners.
There were no means of separating convicts from those committed for
trial, or between felons and those convicted of minor offences, while
juvenile offenders were mixed up with those who were hardened in crime.
The condition of the debtors who were confined in gaol was no better
than that of a convict, because, in many cases, they were destitute of
the means of procuring the necessaries of life, and had to rely on the
charity of the jailer or of their fellow prisoners, for the means of
sustenance. It was evident that a place ought to be provided for
convicts undergoing sentences, and this act was the result. The building
which had been erected by the county of St. John, was taken over by the
Province, and made available for prisoners from any county. This was the
beginning of the Provincial penitentiary at St. John, which was taken
over by the Dominion Government under the terms of confederation, and
continued to serve as a prison for convicts until the building of the
large penitentiary at Dorchester, for the accommodation of all the
convicts of the Maritime Provinces.
At this session a
despatch was laid before the Legislature, from Lord John Russell, with
regard to the coasting trade between New Brunswick and Nova Scotia.
Regulations had been made the previous year by the Imperial authorities,
permitting all British vessels to carry goods between Nova Scotia and
New Brunswick, the produce of either Province, without entry or
clearance. This relieved the coasting trade from a serious impediment
and greatly facilitated business between the two Provinces. At this time
the distress in England was sending emigrants abroad in large numbers
and many of them came to New Brunswick. An emigrant agent had been
appointed some years before, who was charged with the business of
assisting these poor people to find homes for themselves in this
Province. In 1838, 893 emigrants arrived from the British Islands; in
1839 the number was 3,103, and in 1840 no less than 7,777 emigrants came
to New Brunswick. This was a larger number than the Province could
properly absorb in one year, and many of them drifted away to the United
States, yet there was at the same tiine> a complaint of the lack of
skilled labor in several departments of industry, especially of persons
fitted to work on the farms. The average emigrant was not capable of
competing with the native born settler in the rough work of clearing up
the forest, yet about this time, some settlements of emigrants that
aftewards became prosperous were established. A company had been formed
in England, called the Nova Scotia and New Brunswick Land Company,
ostensibly for the purpose of introducing settlers into New Brunswick.
The government sold this company five hundred thousand acres of
excellent land, for 2s. 6d. an acre, and some settlements were founded
by the company in the course of time. A party of settlers came out from
England in 1837, intending to settle on the lands of this company, but
were unable to make satisfactory arrangements. Many of them were in
destitute circumstances, and their condition was brought to the
attention of the Government, who took measures to place them on Crown
lands. Commissioners were appointed to carry out this work, and, three
years later, they were able to report that they had settled twenty-six
families on Crown lands on the road between Fredericton and St. Andrews,
every one of whom had a comfortable liouse to live in, and that 10,279
bushels of grain and root crops had been grown in 1840, on ground that
in August, 1837, was a dense forest. This was the Harvey Settlement,
which was very properly named after its founder, and when Sir John
Harvey took his departure from the Province, none of the numerous
addresses which he received, was more pleasing to him than that from the
Harvey settlers, whose future prosperity he had secured by his care for
their welfare.
At the session of 1840,
Sir John Harvey had laid before the Legislature a despatch from Lord
Russell, on the tenure of public offices. This despatch may be said to
have been the beginning of a new era in the relations between the
officials and the people. His Lordship said that the time had come for a
change in the method of holding office under the Crown. Hitherto offices
had been held practically for life or for good behavior, but now he
thought that heads of departments, such as he Colonial Secretary, the
Treasurer or Receiver-General, the Surveyor-General, the Attorney and
Solicitor-General the Sheriff and other officers entrusted with similar
duties, should be called upon to retire as often as any sufficient
motive of public policy might suggest the expediency of that measure,
and that a change in the person of the Governor should be considered a
sufficient reason for any alteration which his successor might deem it
necessary to make in the list of public functionaries. The same rule was
to be applied to members of the Executive council whenever the public
good seemed to demand it. Here was the first germ of responsible
government, for, if the public good was made the motive for changes in
public offices, the public in time would demand that these offices
should be under their own control. This despatch was referred to a
committee of the whole house, where a resolution was moved that it was
highly satisfactory to the house, and afforded a gratifying proof of the
sincere desire of the Queen and her Government, to infuse principles
into the administration of the council, strictly analogous to the
principles of the British constitution. An amendment was moved to this
to the effect that there was nothing in the despatch to call forth any
expression from the house on the subject of Colonial Government, and
that in the event of any occurrence taking place to disturb the
political peace of the Province, the house believed that any loyal and
dutiful representation would receive, as they had always done, the Royal
consideration. This amendment was carried by the casting vote of the
chairman, Mr. Taylor. All the ancient Toryism of the House was, of
course, opposed to the resolution which favored the principle of
responsible government. Such men as Mr. Partelow and Mr. Brown, who had
been active in obtaining the control of the casual and territorial
revenues for the Province, were hostile to any further change in the
constitution. It is evident that Sir John Harvey did not favor the views
of these opponents of responsible government, for when the despatch was
received in December, 1839, he published it in the Royal Gazette, so
that every one could be made aware of the intentions of the British
Government towards.
the colonies. Such a
despatch was, of course, very obnoxious to the family compact who had
held all the offices since the foundation of the Province, and who had
grown to believe that they alone were entitled to them.
In the spring of 1841,
Sir John Harvey was recalled, after having filled the office of
Lieutenant Governor for about four years. The causes of his recall were
not disclosed at the time, but an explanation of this change was soon
found in his appointment to the Governorship of Newfoundland, where a
man of firm character and yet in sympathy with the people, was required.
Sir John Harvey received more tributes from the people of the Province,
to his worth and character, than any of his predecessors or successors.
Although not so able a man as Sir Howard Douglas, his popularity was
even greater, which perhaps was due to the effect of his management of
the boundary difficulty. There were indeed some newspapers, in New
Brunswick and Nova Scotia, who criticized his conduct in this matter,
but these papers did not represent the views of the people generally.
The Legislature of New Brunswick voluntarily increased his salary to the
extent of £500 sterling, annually, and when he took his departure they
voted £1,500 for the purchase of a service of plate. On leaving the
Province, he received addresses from every county, from the cities of
St. John and Fredericton ; from all the national societies, and his
departure was sincerely lamented by everyone. It was felt that in losing
him, the Province had been deprived of the services of a sincere friend
of its people, and that it would be difficult, if not impossible, to
find a successor in every way equal to him.
This was a period of
development throughout the Province, and in fact all over North America.
The introduction of steam-ships to cross the Atlantic, had brought New
Brunswick into easy communication with the mother country.
Correspondence, which formerly took two or three months to reach the
Province from England, now was received in about fifteen days. This
produced a change in the business arrangements of the people, in their
ways of thinking, and corresponding improvements were demanded with
respect to the internal communications of the country. The demand was
now made for a daily mail between St. John and Halifax, and this was
achieved in due time. Stage coaches began to run between the principal
centres of population, so that travelling became not only quicker but
less expensive. The old ways and the old systems, both in respect to the
business of the country and its political institutions, were beginning
to change, so that in the course of the next ten or twelve years the old
order of things had uttterly passed away.
The new Lieutenant
Governor, Sir William Colebrooke, arrived at Fredericton, in April,
1841, before the departure of Sir John Harvey. This gentleman, like his
predecessors, was an officer of the army. He had served mainly in India,
and had been Lieutenant Governor of the Bahamas, and Governor General of
the Leeward Islands. This was not a very good training for a
constitutional Governor of a Province like New Brunswick, yet Sir
William Colebrooke appears to have endeavored to govern the Province in
a constitutional manner, as he understood it, and if he did make
mistakes, that must be attributed rather to his imperfect knowledge than
a desire to act improperly. He did not engage in quarrels with the House
of Assembly as Sir Archibald Campbell and General Smyth had done, nor
did he endeavor to set up one house against the other, as was the case
with the first Governor of the Province, Thomas Carleton. Sir William
Colebrooke filled the office of Lieutenant Governor of New Brunswick for
seven years, and from thence he was transferred to British Guiana and
Barbadoes.
During the summer of
1841, St. John was visited by another disastrous fire, which swept away
a great deal of property, and there was reason to believe that this was
a work of an incendiary. Several attempts were made during that summer
to set the city on fire, and the people became very much alarmed in
consequence, and organized themselves into a regular night watch for the
purpose of putting a stop to such attempts. The same thing was done
after the great fire of 1877. It seems as if some minds become disposed
to crime under the pressure of excitement, so that after a great fire,
attempts at incendiarism become more frequent. These fires produced a
very depressing effect on the city of St. John, and, joined to the
commercial distress which before prevailed were ruinous to many worthy
people.
Sir William Colebrooke
opened the Legislature on the 19th of January, 1842, with a speech in
which he dealt with many important topics. He recommended the
introduction of those principles of municipal government which were
recognized in the constitution of England, and which he believed would
be found well adapted to the situation of the Province. He suggested the
creation of a Board of Works, for the efficient execution of works of a
public character. He directed their attention to the necessity of
completing the communication with Canada ; the geological survey; the
state of education; the revision of the laws ; imprisonment for debt,
and many other matters were likewise referred to. Most of these subjects
received the attention of the Legislature. The most important act of the
session was that, to vacate the seats of members of the Assembly in
certain cases. It provided that any member who occupied the office of
Executive councillor, or any office of profit or emolument under the
Crown, should be incapable of taking or holding a seat in the general
assembly, while in such office, unless re-elected after his acceptance
thereof. Any member who entered into a contract with the Government for
the performance of any public work also had his seat vacated. This
measure was more stringent than the law of the present day, which only
requires Executive councillors who are heads of departments and receive
salaries, to go back to the people for re-election, yet it does not seem
to have been applied to the case of members who held such offices as
that of clerk of the peace or judge of probate or deputy treasurer,
which were strictly under the control of the executive, and the
emoluments of which were paid in fees. The bill was introduced by Mr.
Charles Fisher, but a glance at the division list shows that it was
opposed by L. A. Wilmot, who became so prominent an advocate of
responsible government. We can only infer from this, that the bearings
of the measure on the constitution, were not fully realized, for among
those who voted for it were J. W. Weldon, the member for Kent, who was
looked upon as the leader of the party opposed to responsible
government. Mr. Weldon was a member of the executive council when the
bill was introduced, but he resigned his seat before it became law.
Another measure passed
at this session, dealt with the term of the House of Assembly, which was
reduced from seven years to four. This bill went through without much
opposition, only five members being found to vote against it. It was
reserved for Her Majesty's consideration, and became law in the course
of the summer. The length of the term of the House of Assembly continued
to be four years from that time until the session of 1902, when an act
was passed, extending the term to five years, which is the same as that
of the Parliament of Canada.
Among the numerous
despatches from the Home Government which were laid before the
Legislature at this session was one from Lord Stanley, the Colonial
Secretary, in which it was stated that the disordered state of the
finances of the Province demanded an early remedy, and asking the
Governor to bring the subject under the serious notice of the
Legislature, with a view to the establishment of a more regular system,
by which the revenue and expenditure might be equalized. Five years
before, the Province had possessed a balance to its credit of about
£150,000, but this had all been spent, and now it was heavily in debt.
This was a natural result of the system of making appropriations, and
the only true remedy for it was the surrender, by private members, of
the right to initiate money votes. This despatch was considered in
committee of the whole house, and a resolution moved that no
appropriation of public money should be made at any future session until
there was a particular account of income and expenditure for the
previous year, together with an estimate of the sums required to be
expended, and the probable revenues for the ensuing year. This was
coming too near responsible government to suit the upholders of the old
system, and accordingly an amendment, which was moved by Mr. John R.
Partelow, was carried by a vote of eighteen to twelve. This declared
that "whereas the present mode of appropriation tested by an experience
of more than fifty years, has not only given satisfaction to the people
of this Province, but repeatedly attracted the deserved approbation of
the colonial ministers, as securing its constitutional position to every
branch of the Legislature, therefore resolved as the opinion of this
committee, that it is not expedient to make any alteration in the same.
"
This amendment was
utterly absurd as well as wholly untrue in its statements, for a system
which had dissipated a large surplus, and run the Province heavily in
debt, was certainly not deserving of the approbation of any colonial
minister, and as a matter of fact, no such approbation had ever been
extended to it. On the contrary the very despatch which the committee
were considering, contained a direct censure on the House of Assembly
for its method of making appropriations. Among those who voted against
this amendment, was the Speaker, the Honorable Charles Simonds, and
Messrs. L. A. Wilmot, Fisher and Hill. The effect of this vote was to
postpone for some time, the movement in favor of responsible government.
In December, 1842, the
general elections took place and the question of responsible government
was largely the ground upon which they turned. This was particularly the
case in the city and county of St. John, and in the county of York,
where the people had a better opportunity of familiarizing themselves
with the question, than in other parts of the Province. Yet the state of
political education must have been extremely backward when an able
lawyer and a man of education, like Robert L. Hazen, of St. John, was
not ashamed to state on the hustings that he never met with any one who
could explain to him satisfactorily, what responsible government meant.
His ignorance was shared by his colleague, Mr. Burns, who was elected
with him, for the City of St. John, the two defeated candidates being
Isaac Woodward and W. H. Street, both of whom had voted against Mr.
Partelow's amendment. The City of St. John,, therefore, if the votes of
its citizens were any criterion, placed itself squarely against
responsible government. On a scrutiny Mr. Street obtained the seat in
place of Mr. Burns, so that the representation of the city stood one
against responsible government and one in favor of it. For the County of
St. John, the members elected were John R. Partelow, John Jordan, Robert
Payne, and the Honorable Charles Simonds. Mr. Partelow was the ablest
opponent of responsible government in the legislature, while his three
colleagues were in favor of that reform. Among the defeated candidates
was William J. Ritchie, then a young barrister, who afterwards rose to
great eminence and became Chief Justice of Canada. Mr. Ritchie was a
thorough reformer and an advocate of responsible government. In the
County of York, Messrs. Wilmot and Fisher were re-elected, but Messrs.
Allan and Taylor, both of whom were opposed to reform, stood higher on
the polls, so that the opinion of York County seemed to be divided on
the question. Taking the whole Province together, the opponents of
reform had a decided majority, a result that must be attributed largely
to the people not having a clear understanding of the principle
involved. It was easy for a self-seeking member to persuade his
constituents that to place the initiation of money votes in the hands of
the executive would lessen their chances of receiving grants for their
local needs, and place the executive in a position to treat their claims
with indifference or contempt. Nor was the composition of the executive
council of that day such as to invite confidence, for, of the ten
members who composed it, only four were in the House of Assembly. Its
members were appointed by the Governor and could be removed by him at
liis pleasure, so that they were responsible to the Governor, and not to
the people or to the represntatives of the people in the House of
Assembly. There was no way in which the House of Assembly could bring
about the retirement of an obnoxious member of the executive, and not
one of the heads of departments had a seat in the House of Assembly. The
Attorney General, Solicitor General, Provincial Secretary, Surveyor
General and Receiver General, were all members of the Legislative
council, which was considered a more respectable, as well as more
influential body than the House of Assembly. These facts show that while
it was necessary to good government that the initiation of money votes
should be placed in the hands of the executive council, a great deal
more than that required to be done before the constitution of New
Brunswick could be placed on a satisfactory footing.
When the Legislature
met in January, 1843, the friends of the old system felt so confident of
their increased strength, that they determined to emphasize it by
electing a Speaker of their own party. The Honorable Charles Simonds, of
St. John, had filled the office of Speaker for several years with much
acceptance, but it was determined to displace him, and elect the
Honorable John Wesley Weldon to fill the chair. The intention of the
opponents of reform was sufficiently shown by the speech of Mr. Partelow
in nominating Mr. Weldon, when he declared that he would throw down the
gauntlet in opposition to what was called Responsible Government. Mr.
Weldon was elected without opposition, and he was a good representative
2f of the old order of things. This gentleman when he was appointed
Speaker, held several other offices which at the present day would
prevent him from being elected to the Legislature. He was post-master of
Richibucto, deputy-treasurer of Richibucto, issuer of marriage licenses
for the county of Kent, keeper of the seals, and Clerk of the Peace, and
of the Inferior Court of Common Pleas for the county of Kent, and
Registrar of the Probate Court for that county. The holding of such a
plurality of offices was common enough in New Brunswick at that time,
and it emphasizes the difference in the way that things were viewed by
the people then, as compared with the present day.
The Lieutenant Governor
in his opening speech, recommended a revision of the election laws, the
renewal of the laws for the support of the parish schools, and the
timely adoption of such a system of finance as would restore confidence
in the integrity of the Province, and retrieve public credit. The
reference he made to the necessity of measures which appeared to be
called for " to improve, on English principles, the institutions of the
Province," shows that the Governor was in advance of a majority of the
Legislature in his views as a reformer. There had been a great failure
in the revenue in consequence of the commercial distress, and the credit
of the Province was very low. A message from th Lieutenant Governor
showed that the debts and liabilities of the Province, exceeded by about
£33,000 its revenue and resources, so that the Provincial funds were
liable to a heavy charge for interest. A despatch from Lord Stanley was
placed before the Legislature, which attributed the financial
embarassment of the Province, to the lack of a proper executive control
over the expenditure. Lord Stanley thought that the remedy for the
embarassments of the Province, rested with the Provincial Legislature,
and not with the Imperial Government, and he thought that there was an
urgent necessity for decided measures to check the growing and
formidable evil. This was rather a cold douche for those who had voted
the previous year that the old system was so perfect that it had
repeatedly received the praise of colonial ministers, but it had not the
effect of bringing about any change in their views.
Mr. Charles Fisher was
the most active advocate of reform at this period and took the lead in
bringing to the attention of the House many important measures. One of
these was a bill to fix the qualifications of members of the Legislative
Council. The members of the House of Assembly were required to possess a
qualification in land, to the value of £300 above all encumbrances, but
there was no qualification required of a member of the Legislative
Council. A bill to fix the qualification at £500 was passed by the
House, but defeated in the Council. Mr. Fisher also introduced a series
of resolutions which were carried unanimously in the House. The first
declared that a petition should be presented to the Queen for a
reduction of the charges on the Province under the civil list bill; the
second limited the salary of the heads of departments to £600 per annum
; the third declared that all fees of office should go into the public
treasury, and not into the pockets of the holders of the office, as had
been the case previously. These reforms were all achieved in time, but
not immediately. There were too many influences at work to keep the
salaries of the departmental officers at a high figure, for every one
who held an office, thought that he had a vested right to the same
emoluments that had been enjoyed by his predecessors. The Lieutenant
Governor laid before the House, the report of the Auditor on the
accounts of the Provincial Treasury, and a report from the treasurer,
with an estimate of the revenue for the current year, which had been
calculated on the scale of duties recommended to be levied. This was
intended by his Excellency to assist the House in calculating its
expenditures, but it was looked upon apparently by a majority of that
body as an insult. The House went into committee upon it and passed a
resolution by a vote of 21 to 10, that the House should view any
recommendation for laying duties on the people, as an interference with
its acknowledged rights and privileges. There was a very hot debate over
this resolution which was upheld by men who had been very prominent in
supporting former Governors in their illegal and arbitrary measures.
At a later day in the
session, Mr. Brown of Charlotte, moved a resolution, requiring that a
statement of the finances of the Province should be made up before the
opening of the annual session of the Legislature, under the direction of
the Governor, and laid before the House, and that the amount granted in
supply, should not exceed the estimated amount of revenue set forth in
this financial statement. This was a very reasonable resolution, for
certainly the practice of granting money which the Province did not
possess and could not obtain, was very detrimental to its credit. This
was met by an amendment moved by the Speaker, Mr. Weldon, that nothing
had transpired which should induce the House to depart from its recorded
opinion on the subject of the initiation of money grants, in February of
1842. This was carried by a vote of twenty-four to seven, the only
persons who voted against it, being the Honorable Mr. Simonds of St.
John, Messrs. Hill and Boyd of Charlotte, Mr. Rankine of Northumberland,
Messrs. Fisher and Wilmot of York, and Mr. Barker of Sunbury. Mr. Brown,
the mover of the resolution, actually voted for this amendment which was
intended to destroy its effect, a sufficient proof, that even those
members who were in favor of reform had a very poor grasp of the
question in all its bearings,
It had been a subject
of complaint against the Legislative Council that it was composed mainly
of members of one denomination, the Church of England, and that in other
respects it did not represent properly, the interests of the people. An
address, setting forth a number of reasons why the composition of the
Council was unsatisfactory, was prepared and forwarded to her Majesty
during the session of 1843. This address stated that the Legislative
council should be composed of persons representing not only all the
leading interests of the Province, and connected with the principal
denominations of Christians, but of independent property and free from
official influence. One great objection to the Council was, that a great
proportion of its members held offices at pleasure, » under the Crown,
and the principal officers of the Government generally formed a majority
of the members present. This address met with a prompt response from the
home authorities, and one result of it was, the retirement of four
members of the council, Mr. Baillie, the Surveyor General; Mr. Lee, the
Receiver General; and Messrs. Allenshaw and Harry Peters. In their
places were appointed Messrs. Minchen, Crane, T. H. Peters and Captain
Owen. These changes produced a considerable amount of indignation in the
Legislative Council, for every member felt his own seat was in danger,
and it was rather galling to the pride of the members, to think that
such changes should have been made at the demand of the House of
Assembly. The new members were not thought to be much improvement on the
old.
There were a number of
changes in the executive council during the latter part of 1843. Messrs.
Black, Shore, Robinson, and Crane retired, and their places were filled
by Messrs. Hugh Johnston, E. B. Chandler, John Montgomery, Robert L.
Hazen, John R. Partelow, William H. Street and L. A. Wilmot. As most of
the members of the council were opponents of responsible government, it
is singular that Mr. Wilmot should have consented to become a member. He
ought to have known that no large measure of reform was possible while
the executive council was constituted as it was, and that by becoming a
member he was only assisting to postpone the cause of reform. Mr. Wilmot
certainly lost prestige by his action on this occasion, as he did
subsequently from the display of a similar weakness. |