“Hath not old custom
made this life more sweet
Than that of painted pump? Are not these woods
More free from peril than the envious court?”
Shakespeare.
IMMEDIATELY after the
War of 1812 (to which period belongs the beginning of settlement in
Lanark County), the military and civic officials in Canada, the half-pay
officers and other educated British settlers, seem to have been obsessed
(not unnaturally) with fear and dislike of the Americans. The travellers
of the time constantly held up to ridicule and obloquy American manners
and American morality, but this distrust did not deter “Yankee” pioneers
from flocking into the country, from making, as individuals, as much as
possible of it their own, nor from doing it good service by their
experience of similar conditions of life.
As was mentioned
previously, the Rideau Canal owed its inception to this chronic
suspicion of our neighbours, and, of course, it was always in the
thoughts of the actual constructors of the work. Possibly, therefore,
their accounts of the Yankees, in Lanark and elsewhere, may not have
been quite free from prejudice. There are, however, some interesting
pages concerning Lanark County in a book, published about 1828, by John
McTaggart, clerk of the works on the canal, who was sent through the
country to make careful surveys and reports, and from his pages one can
glean many a picture of the state of the district through which the
canal was to pass. Of course, his first interest is in the river, vexed
in its course by rapids or plunging madly over great ledges of rock, but
he gives some glimpses of the scattered settlers and their doings.
Hinting now and then at
the lonely beauty of the wilderness, he paints the land, upon the whole,
in somewhat forbidding colours. He tells of long stretches of swamp
where, by actual measurement, the black mud was over three feet in
depth. These dread morasses were the haunt, as canal-workers and
settlers alike found to their cost, of fever and ague. They were the
haunt, too, of all manner of noxious stinging and biting insects—black
flies and hornets and mosquitoes in clouds—which tortured all the
workers at their patient measuring and surveying. In the spring the
thickly growing forests were strangely vocal with wild pigeons
innumerable, sometimes flying in flocks of “five acres” in extent.
Swamps and dense woods
must have had a subduing effect on their few human inhabitants, for
McTaggart mentions of "a melancholy peculiar to Canada". The notion
scarcely suits with our twentieth-century conception of our young
country, nor does it seem altogether to accord with the idea one gets of
the man himself, who, amidst the manifold difficulties of his
canal-building, was so eager and enthusiastic as to be dreaming strange
dreams of a “grand canal” across the northern half of the North American
continent, through a “notch” in the Rockies to the waters of the
Pacific, upon which he saw visions of a city of Nookta as large as the
metropolis of the Empire itself.
But McTaggart was not
always in the clouds. He could grow eloquent in dispraise of the “cheap
and nasty” whisky made in every little hamlet from bad potatoes and
other refuse, to the great detriment of the health, morals, and fortunes
of the people. At that time distilleries seemed to be regarded as only
second in importance to grist mills and sawmills, which were generally
built by the aristocrats amongst the pioneers, or “settlers of
eminence,” as McTaggart calls them. Of course, many of the energetic
settlers also took to keeping the tiny village stores, which had to
cater for the wants of a very miscellaneous population. For instance, in
headgear, it was customary for them to keep “white hats for Yankees,
black hats for Irish, and Kilmarnock bonnets for Canadians.”
As might be guessed
from its Scottish name, Lanark township was largely settled by
Scotch—many of them Glasgow weavers; and in that day, when means of
communication throughout the country were so deficient, any settlers
might count themselves fortunate if within reach of neighbours whose
upbringing and modes of thought bore some resemblance to their own.
In the year 1816 the
townships of Bathurst, Drummond, and Beckwith (like the neighbouring
township of Goulburn in Carleton County) were settled to a considerable
extent by discharged soldiers, some of whom had been, it is said, “with
Abercrombie in Egypt, with Wellington and Sir John Moore in Spain, with
Cornwallis in America,” but the greater part had seen service in 1812,
when Canada was the battlefield. At a very great expense, the British
Government—partly to strengthen the Colony from the military point of
view—“ tried to make these old soldiers and their families as
comfortable as possible. . . . They chose their locations without
expense, and each man received, according to his rank, from one hundred
to five hundred acres. They were also supplied with all necessary
implements of husbandry, and tools for building purposes; also cooking
utensils and blankets, with one year’s provisions for each man, woman,
and child.” Some of the ex-soldiers of this "Perth settlement” did well.
Others stayed only as long as the distribution of rations continued, or
until they could obtain some trifle for their lands. By the middle of
the century it was said that scarcely oue soldier-settler in fifty had
remained for good; but by that time Irish and English immigrants had
filled up the deserted holdings.
In 1815 proclamations
had been issued in Britain inviting civilians also, under certain
conditions, to become settlers in Upper or Lower Canada, as they might
choose, though the exact location was left to the Government; and some
of the Perth settlement pioneers were gathered in this way. According to
Robert Gourlay, that industrious hunter-out of abuses, the good
intentions of the Government were, in part, frustrated by the
carelessness and bad conduct of its accredited agents. As a beginning,
the new-comers, unused to axe-work, were obliged to cut a road twenty
miles long through the wooded wilderness before they could reach the
principal place of settlement, and, arriving there, found the surveying
of their lands only beginning. Sometimes, too, the promised rations were
stopped for very slight reasons.
The county town of
Perth was laid out by the Government in 1816, on an island in the Tay
River, which was afterwards rendered navigable for small vessels to the
Rideau Canal by a private company. Sixty years ago Perth was a clean,
thriving little place of nearly 2000 inhabitants. Its attractiveness was
due largely to its river and its many stone buildings. Its population
has nearly doubled since then, but it has been outstripped by its
younger rival, Smith's Falls. Originally, by the way, the progress of
this latter place was, it is said, much hindered by the cupidity of its
owners, who asked as much as two hundred and fifty pounds for
quarter-acre lots in the business section of the village.
Of course in the early
days there were many squatters in the county, who, going into the
wilderness in advance of the surveyors, built their shanties and made
their little clearing^, trusting to the authorities to give due
consideration to their claims whenever the country should be opened
formally to settlement. McTaggart tells that, in the winter of 1827,
when, going with his men through the woods in a part of Lanark County
which he believed to be absolutely unsettled, he came on the track of a
sleigh—a sight almost as astonishing, under the circumstances, as was
the footprint to Robinson Crusoe on his desolate island. Following the
track, the party came to a clearing of about seven acres, in the midst
of which "a neat little log-house sat smoking.” Its master, in a voice
trembling with emotion at the unusual sight of strangers, asked them to
“Come ben.” Accepting the invitation, they entered to find “a snug
little cabin,” a wife, three children, some sleek grey cats, and a good
dog. "Having broached the rum jug” (not the simplest courtesy was then
complete without strong drink), they all sat down to listen to their
host's story.
A plain working man,
Peter Armstrong by name, from Hawick, in Scotland, he had managed,
fifteen years earlier, to save enough to come to Canada; had “fought up
the water St. Lawrence to a place they called Perth, and there finding
nought to do—nae country wark”— (one wonders what they did in that
pioneer hamlet, if not country work!)—“ he just went afar into the heart
of the wild woods with his axe, dog and gun, and, after looking about,
fixed on the place where we found him for his abode in this world.
“Year by year, he
wrought away all by himself—read the Bible every Sabbath day—made a
journey to Perth twice a year and bought wee needfuls; at last got a
house, and sleigh, and cleared about five acres.”Having good health,“
spring-water plenty just aside him,” and no lack of firewood, he lived
well enough for five long solitary years, on “what he caught, shot,
gathered, or grew.” “All at once, on one of his visits to Perth, whom
should he meet but Tibby Patterson, who was the byre-woman at the laird
of Branksome’s, where he was once a herd lad. Far frae hame in a wild
land,” with few friends, they were drawn to each other at once. So they
were married by one of the irregular weddings of those days when parsons
were so far to seek—and for nine years they had lived happily, deep in
the great woods. But McTaggart wondered less at their content than at
the grumbling of others whom he met in his wanderings, who would neither
leave the woods and “fight for an honest living and cheerful society,
nor yet be at peace in them.” |