| 
		 EVERY institution has 
		some set phrases peculiar to itself. Navigation has its wharves, its 
		quays, and its docks; railways, banks, etc., have their presidents, 
		their managers and their agents. The Churches have their synods, their 
		assemblies, and their conferences. Among the Methodists the phrase 
		“Going to Conference” is a very suggestive one. It means a great deal 
		more than the majority of people imagine. There are those who fancy that 
		going to Conference is very much like going to a picnic or a ten days’ 
		pleasure party; but to a Methodist minister it is the very opposite to 
		that. To him it means the review of the past, the scrutiny of the 
		present, and the forecast of the future; to him it means a week or ten 
		days of close attention to the details of business, intense thought, 
		earnest discussion, and sometimes harrowing opposition and distasteful 
		decisions; to him it often means the severing of cords that have been 
		strengthening for three years past, and the breaking up of associations 
		that have been widening and deepening month after month during a whole 
		ministerial term according to discipline. It means to him the loss of 
		the sight of well-known faces and of hearing the sound of familiar 
		names. 
		 
		There was a time when to me the very thought of going to Conference 
		would almost make me shudder. In the M. E. Church, at the time that 1 
		joined the ranks of the itinerancy, it was the custom to give every man 
		in the Conference a thorough overhauling in open Conference. The Bishop 
		would ask all the questions that the discipline required, and some that 
		it did not; then he would hand the unfortunate subject of brotherly 
		dissection over to the tender mercies of conferential anatomists to be 
		dealt with according to the whim or caprice of any and every member who 
		might wish to show his ability as an inquisitor, or his ingenuity as a 
		self-constituted detective. No man could, at that time, go to Conference 
		feeling safe, no matter how careful or faithful he had been in his work. 
		He did not know but that the ghost of some duty, overlooked or 
		forgotten, would arise and confront him in the presence of all; he could 
		not tell but that the echo of some unguarded word might come ringing to 
		his ears, and make more noise in Conference than all his prayers and 
		sermons and songs of praise could do. A man was once charged with crime 
		and taken into court; the indictment was read and the crown lawyer made 
		his charge in very strong language, as is usual. The judge asked the 
		prisoner if he was “guilty or not guilty.” He said: “When I came into 
		court I really thought that I was innocent of the crime charged against 
		me; but since I have heard the reading of that document, and the speech 
		of that lawyer, I do not know what to think about it.” Just so; a man 
		might go to Conference thinking that his record was not a bad one, and 
		that he might be considered a pretty fair average among reasonably good 
		men; but by the time that Doctor Rake-him-up and some others were done 
		with him, he might doubt if there was a mite of honesty, or a particle 
		of piety in his whole composition. But those days passed away years ago, 
		and the Methodism of this country will never allow them to return. We 
		now have a better way to reach the same results. No man should throw out 
		an insinuation that may cast a slur on a brother’s good name unless he 
		is prepared to formulate specific charges. 
		 
		The greatest tongue-lashing that I ever gave a minister was for a matter 
		of this kind. A young man had been his colleague, and was recommended 
		for admission on trial in the Conference; his superintendent was called 
		upon to give information respecting the young man. He went on to say 
		that the young man was a fair preacher, and that he stood pretty well 
		among the people, “but,” said he, “I have good reason to believe that he 
		is in the habit of receiving letters from a married woman, and I do not 
		know what they are all about.” On enquiry it was found that his 
		statement was entirely correct, but when explanations were given, it 
		came out the letters were from the young man’s married sister. Some of 
		them were on business, and others such as any sister might write to a 
		brother. I concluded that a man like that deserved a talking to, and he 
		got it. 
		 
		In going to Conference the mode of travel is mostly-determined by 
		circumstances. When the Conference is one of very extended boundaries, 
		it becomes a matter of considerable importance to those who live at a 
		distance from the place where its sessions are to be held. The present 
		mode of travel is by railway mostly; but in the past it was not so. I 
		have gone to Conference on the boat, on the cars, on wheels, on 
		horseback, and on foot. The last mentioned is the most independent way 
		of going; then there are no fees to pay, no horse to feed, no wheels to 
		grease, and no one to be thanked ; but still I would not advise that way 
		of going, as it is a little wearisome. And I have gone to Conference 
		when it took me three full days’ travel to reach it; and I have gone 
		when a few minutes’ walk would take me to it. 
		 
		I have met with interesting episodes before now when on my way to 
		Conference. I propose to relate a few of them. Once I was going from 
		Teeswater to Ingersoll. The country was new and the roads anything but 
		good. I had no horse ; I shouldered my carpet-bag and started otf on 
		foot. I did not know whether I should have to walk all the way or not. 
		The nearest railroad to me was the Grand Trunk at Guelph or Stratford, 
		and the Grand Trunk did not go to Ingersoll at that time. When I got as 
		far as Listowel I found that the preacher there, Peter Hicks, was going 
		to Conference with a horse and buggy. He kindly offered me a chance to 
		ride with him, which offer I thankfully accepted. We started early in 
		the morning and reached the village of Mitchell by noon. 
		 
		We fed the horse and got dinner at a hotel. We went on to Stratford and 
		fed the horse. There we inquired the road, and after getting what 
		information we could we started on, intending to go to the home of Mr. 
		T. B. Brown, a local preacher with whom I was acquainted. We got on the 
		wrong road; night came on us and found us in the midst of a settlement 
		of Irish Catholics. At length we came to a little wayside tavern. It 
		hardly could be called a hotel. We drove up to the door and went in. 
		About a dozen men were drinking in the bar-room. We looked around and 
		saw the condition of things, and then went out for a consultation, after 
		inquiring the distance to St. Mary’s. We talked the matter over a 
		little, when Hicks said, “I will go in and see if any Orangemen are 
		there.” He came out shortly and said, “They are Papists, every one of 
		them, and the landlord is the biggest dogan of the lot.” This was not 
		very reassuring intelligence. However, we concluded to stay, as there 
		seemed no help for it.  We went in again and asked the landlord if 
		he could accommodate us with supper and bed, and the horse with hay and 
		oats. He said, “You must see the missus about the supper, as it is after 
		hours, but I can promise you the rest.” I said to Hicks, “You look after 
		the horse, and I will see about the supper.” I hunted up the landlady, 
		whom I found putting away the newly washed dishes. I explained the 
		reason of our coming in so late. I told her that we were very hungry, 
		and asked her to let us have some supper. She very good naturedly set 
		about it, and in a few minutes she had a very respectable meal ready for 
		us. Meanwhile the noise in the bar-room became more boisterous and loud. 
		We ate our supper and then went out to fix up the horse for the night. 
		That being done, we went to our room for the night. We fastened the door 
		and then considered the situation. We could hear from the barroom every 
		now and then angry words and oaths and imprecations. We could not tell 
		who were the subjects of these anathemas, but we had no doubt they 
		suspected that we were Protestant ministers by the glances that would 
		pass between them as we went out and in through the room. 
		 
		We did not get into bed until long after midnight, and after the noisy 
		rabble had gone ofl and the house became quiet. In the morning we did 
		not wait for breakfast, but we went on a few miles and called at a 
		farmhouse and got breakfast. They told us there that we had done well to 
		get away without trouble, as the place was a very rough one. We did not 
		stop there when we came back. The action of the lady on that occasion 
		harmonizes with a statement made by the late Dr. Livingstone in respect 
		to the women in Africa. He says that he never asked a woman a question 
		and did not receive a civil answer, and he never asked a favour that was 
		not courteously granted if in her power to do so. 
		 
		The first man I met that I knew, as we drove into Ingersoll, was one who 
		was a very popular preacher when I was working as a mechanic. He had 
		been my pastor for two years, and I loved him as my own brother; but he 
		had been expelled for drunkenness some time before. When he saw me, he 
		ran across the street to meet me: with tears in his eyes, and sobbing 
		like a home-sick child, he said, “Oh, Brother Hilts, what would I not 
		give to-day, if I had it, to be as I was when you first met me.’' My 
		heart ached for that man. He had been one of the most genial and affable 
		men that I had ever known; but the love of drink was his bane through 
		life. He had inherited alcoholism from his parents, and had not 
		sufficient self-government nor grace to control it. I have been told 
		that he died under the shadow of a tree, on the Pacific coast, as he was 
		trying to make his way to the gold fields of Cariboo. 
		 
		An Uncircumcised Ishmaelite. 
		 
		Before the extension of the Northern Railway to Meaford, people had to 
		go to Collingwood before they could take the cars. I was on my way to 
		Conference, which was to meet in Port Perry. While waiting at the 
		Collingwood station an elderly gentleman came up to me and said, 
		“Mister, did you not preach in the M. E. Church in Meaford last night?” 
		I said, “Yes, sir; or at least I tried to do so.” “Well,” said he, “my 
		name is Blank; I have been from home a while, and I have not been as 
		good as I might have been, so I thought that I would go to church last 
		night. My wife is a member of that church, and she is a good woman, and 
		I think she will be pleased when I tell her that I have gone to church 
		while I have been from home.” We went into the car and Mr. B. sat in the 
		seat with me. Presently he said, “Look here, mister, you men like to 
		find a good table to sit down to and a good stable to put your horse in. 
		I have got both of these at home.” “Well,” said I, “the preachers call 
		on you sometimes, I hope,” “Yes,” he said, “they do often, and I am glad 
		to have them come. They call me the kind-hearted and good-natured 
		“uncircumcised Ishmaelite.” I told him that I was glad that the 
		preachers liked him, and that I hoped they would do him good. “ Well,” 
		he replied, “I like them well enough, but either they can’t or they 
		won’t answer questions.” I said, “Perhaps more questions are 
		unanswerable.” He then said, “Will you tell me how many folks Abraham 
		and his wife took with them when they went to Egypt?” I said, “Sir, I 
		can’t tell; I never studied that question, and I don’t think it is found 
		in any of the arithmetics that I have seen.” He asked me a number of 
		questions on different subjects, but I played shy of all of them until 
		he seemed to get a little nettled. At last I said to him, “Mr. B., I am 
		too old to think that I know a great deal, but I can tell you how to get 
		your questions all answered.” “How?” said he. “The first young man you 
		meet with who has plenty of conceit, with no beard on his face and but 
		little brains in his head, ask him and he will tell you all about it.” 
		 
		By this time we had reached Newmarket. I stopped over till the next day. 
		When I came to the station in the morning I found Mr. Blank, along with 
		a number of others, waiting for the train. As soon as I got on the 
		platform he came to me and said, “Mister, you dodged all my questions 
		yesterday; now I have one that I really wish to have answered. It is 
		this: “Has a negro a soul?” I said, “1 think he has; he is a man, and 
		every man has a soul.” “Well, how does he come to be black?” I answered 
		that probably climatic influences and habits of life had a good deal to 
		do with making him black. “Hot climates make people dark, and cold 
		climates make them fair.” I said. He said, “I don’t believe that; for 
		there are darkies in the Southern States whose ancestors came there two 
		hundred years ago, and they are just as black as their forefathers were 
		the day they left Africa.” “That may be all true,” I answered; “but then 
		the hot climate of the Southern States is not the most favourable 
		surroundings for a negro if you want to bleach him. Have you never seen 
		one in a transition state?” I asked him. “No,” said he, “I never have. 
		Have you?” I said, “I think so; at any rate, I have seen men that, for 
		the life of me, I could not tell whether they were faded negroes or 
		tanned white men.” Mr. Blank was a very dark-complexioned man. He looked 
		at me for a minute, and then said, “Did you mean that for me?” “By no 
		means sir,” I said; “I had nothing personal in my intention. I simply 
		stated a fact in replying to your question, if I had seen a negro in a 
		transition state.” The train came up and we parted, and I have never met 
		him since; but after all I could not help liking the man, and I hope he 
		may do well. 
		 
		A Southern Blasphemer Silenced. 
		 
		The civil war in America produced a large crop of “bounty-jumpers” and 
		“skedaddlers.” The former came from the North as a general thing, and 
		the latter mostly came from the South. Many of these were the sons of 
		Southern gentlemen who thought too much of slavery to let it die an easy 
		death, and too much of themselves to take a soldier’s chances in the 
		field of battle to keep it alive. 
		 
		When the negro was about to he carried to freedom on a wave of blood, 
		these chivalrous defenders of this peculiar institution betook 
		themselves to a land where the bondsman’s footprints are never seen, a 
		land where the black man is entitled to “life, liberty and the pursuit 
		of happiness,” as well as his white neighbour. 
		 
		On a sunny day in the spring, one of the Grand Trunk ears going east 
		from Toronto was partly filled with Methodist ministers on their way to 
		Conference. In a seat near the centre of the car there sat a man of 
		striking appearance: he was tall, and straight, and rawboned. His 
		complexion had that peculiar blending of shades of colour that made it 
		hard to tell to what branch of the human race he claimed affinity; his 
		features, too, were a puzzle; his black eye had a look that might 
		indicate cruelty and stoicism; his forehead gave proof of a strong 
		intellect; his mouth and chin were those of a man of an unbending will, 
		while his nose gave the lie to all the rest, and unmistakably proclaimed 
		him a coward. 
		 
		A number of miles had been passed over without anything to disturb the 
		people or attract attention, when there came a volley of oaths from the 
		man in the centre seat, that made the men look up with astonishment, and 
		the women fairly wilt like a scorched leaf. The terrible words came from 
		the Southerner. Just behind him there sat a minister by the name of D. 
		Carscaden. He was a slender man and not at all strong; but he could not 
		tolerate such outrageous blasphemy. He very gently and kindly informed 
		the swearer that his language was painful to him and many others in the 
		car. This only made matters worse ; the man got angry at this. The 
		string of terrible oaths that he rolled out beat everything that I had 
		ever heard, and the look of contempt that he cast upon poor Carscaden 
		was enough to drive a stronger man than he was into hysterics. Just in 
		the midst of the volcanic eruptions of dreadful words that one might 
		imagine came right from the brimstone regions, a hand was laid on the 
		swearer’s shoulder; he looked up to see to whom the hand belonged; he 
		saw standing in the aisle beside him a man of grand muscular development 
		and fearless aspect. He said to the blasphemer, “Sir, you must stop this 
		at once, or this train will be slackened up and you will be put out of 
		the car. When you are in your own country, you can do as you please, if 
		people will let you; but in this country you must behave yourself if you 
		expect to travel in the cars. Now, not another word of that sort, or the 
		conductor will be called and you will go out.” 
		 
		This was another minister, O. G. Collamore; I know he will excuse my 
		naming him; he is too much of a man to be ashamed of a manly action. 
		 
		When Collamore sat down, the Southerner came out of his seat and walked 
		up and down the aisle for a few times scanning his new opponent closely, 
		as if to take the measure of the man. What his conclusions were can only 
		be inferred from his action. He went back into his seat. This episode 
		created quite a sensation in the ear and everybody felt that the matter 
		was not yet ended. 
		 
		After a little, the man spoke to the following effect, as nearly as I 
		can recall his words to mind: “Ladies and gentlemen, I owe an apology to 
		you all for the language that I have been using. Whatever you may think 
		of me, don’t lay the blame upon my parents; they taught me better than 
		to speak such words, especially in the presence of ladies. I am sorry 
		for what I did, and I will not do it again.” 
		 
		Every one felt a relief at the turn the affair took, and I think the 
		Southerner had more respect for Canadians than he would if he had been 
		allowed to go on unchecked. 
		 
		Meeting a Man of Mark. 
		 
		I was not going to Conference at the time that the incident occurred 
		that I am about to relate, but still I was travelling on the cars. The 
		Great Western Railway had but recently been opened for traffic. One 
		morning in the early spring, I was, along with others, sitting in a car 
		at Hamilton station, waiting for the train to start west. An old woman 
		came into the car selling apples. As she passed along the aisle, she 
		came to an elderly gentleman, whose father!}" appearance and kindly look 
		seemed to give the old woman confidence, so that she continued to press 
		him to buy, after he had told her that he did not need any of her fruit. 
		Presently he said to her: 
		 
		"Madam, have you any children?” 
		 
		She answered him, Indade, sir, I have six of them and so I have, and I 
		their mother, am a poor widdy, and so I am. And it’s to they and get a 
		crumb for the little dears that I am here selling apples the day, and so 
		it is.” 
		 
		“Well,” he said, “how much will you take for all that you have in your 
		basket?” 
		 
		She counted them all over and fixed the price. He then gave her the 
		money for them, and said to her: 
		 
		“Now these apples are mine, to do with them as I please.” 
		 
		“Yes, sir,” she said. “You do what you please wid ’em, only give me back 
		my basket?” 
		 
		“Now,” said the man, “I am going to trust you to do with those apples as 
		I tell you.” 
		 
		“And what do you want me to do wid them, sir. I must have me basket 
		anyway.” 
		 
		“I want you to take the apples home and divide them among your 
		children,” said he. “Will you do it?” 
		 
		I will not try to give the number, or describe the quality of the 
		blessings that the old woman invoked upon the body and soul of the kind 
		stranger. After she left the train, he said to me: 
		 
		“Likely she will sell them before she gets home, but if she does, that 
		is her business and not mine. I gave them to her in good faith for her 
		children, and if she deceives me, and robs them, she alone will be 
		responsible.” 
		 
		The train started, and nothing more was said about 
		 
		the old woman or her apples. When we got to Paris, the engine ran off 
		the track, and we were detained for about sixteen hours before we could 
		proceed. During the time I got into conversation with the man who bought 
		the apples. Among other tilings he said to tne : 
		 
		“I try to get into conversation with all classes of people that I meet 
		with. So much can be learned by taking people on their own ground. You 
		are always safe in speaking to people about what they feel a great deal 
		of interest in. You may at any time or in any place speak to a mother 
		about her children. See how quick that woman was drawn out this morning 
		when her children were mentioned. Just so you may speak to a man about 
		his trade or calling. You may speak to an invalid about his sufferings, 
		or to a penitent sinner about salvation, and be sure of a willing 
		listener.” Before parting from this interesting stranger, I said to him: 
		 
		“Sir, I have been much interested and highly pleased during the time 
		that we have been together. Will you permit me to ask you, where do you 
		live, and what is your name?” 
		 
		He answered, with a pleasant smile upon his face: “As to where 1 live, 
		it is not easy to say. My home is anywhere within the limits of the 
		British Empire, or within the hospitalities of the English-speaking 
		race. But as to my name, it is not so hard to answer Have you ever heard 
		of Alexander Duff? ” 
		 
		I said I had read in the papers about a man of that name, who is a 
		Presbyterian missionary to India.” 
		 
		He said, “I am he.” 
		 
		“Well, sir,” [ answered, “I am not a Scotchman, nor a Presbyterian, but 
		as a Briton, a Canadian, and a Christian, I must, before leaving you, 
		have a shake of your hand, and bid you God-speed, and I pray that the 
		Lord may guide you on your way and help you in your work.” 
		 
		He thanked me cordially for my good wishes, and we shook hands and 
		parted. I was highly gratified by having seen and conversed with a man 
		who, at that time, was looming up before the Christian world as a star 
		of the first magnitude. I find in his description of his visit to this 
		country a reference to the accident at Paris, but he says nothing about 
		the apple woman and her children. 
		 
		Bad News at Conference. 
		 
		On my way to Conference I often met with things that interested me. But 
		at the Conference I sometimes heard things that made me sad. It may seem 
		strange that, although I have lost many friends and relatives during the 
		fifty years that have elapsed since the death of my mother, I have only 
		been permitted to attend the funeral of three of them—two children and 
		one grandchild. That is all. The Lord gave us five sons and three 
		daughters. The latter are all dead and are buried in different counties, 
		far apart. One lies beside its maternal grandfather in Lincoln county; 
		the other two sleep among strangers in the counties of Grey and Bruce. 
		 
		There are times when itinerants are lost to their friends. This is 
		caused by removals from place to place, and from neglect in giving 
		information as to present location. There is really no necessity for 
		this in a country with post-offices in every little village. But 
		sometimes people do not communicate with their distant friends, because 
		of the unpleasant truths that they would tell if they sent to inform 
		their friends of the circumstances in which they were placed. Some 
		people will suffer in silence rather than annoy others with a recitation 
		of their troubles. Sickness comes and goes and nothing is said about it. 
		Death takes place in sundered families and no intelligence is given 
		until long afterwards. In my own case the Conference has been a sort of 
		sad medium of communication between the living and the dead. At one 
		Conference I was told of a sisters departure from this life. At another 
		I heard that my brother had died and was buried. At Conference I first 
		heard of the death of my father, my stepmother, my wife’s mother and 
		stepfather, besides other relatives. 
		 
		Ministers are always willing to enlighten each other and to help each 
		other, and to sympathize with and help each other’s friends as far as 
		they can. At least, that has been my experience with them. While every 
		person is supposed to have a place in the affectionate regards of the 
		Methodist minister, I think I am not overstating the case when I say 
		that, other things being equal, there is a peculiar drawing on his part 
		to the family and friends of his brother ministers. I am free to confess 
		that it is the case with regard to myself, and I have often heard others 
		say the same. 
		 
		I have not missed a Conference in thirty years. I have been a member of 
		twenty-eight Annual Conferences, and I have been in my seat at every 
		session from first to last, with the exception of one day. I have been a 
		member of four General Conferences. From one of these I was kept by 
		sickness. I started to go, but I had to return home too sick to go on. 
		But after all, I like very much to go to Conference, and I shall be very 
		sorry if the time ever comes that I am not able to do so, until the time 
		comes for me to answer to my name at the great roll-call of Conference 
		above.  |