About the close of my
fifth year my life almost came to an abrupt termination. The sensitive
heart of infancy is quick in apprehension when its happiness is
threatened, and in many secret misgivings I told myself that life was
already finished. But I recovered, and became one of the healthiest of
the sons of Adam.
I was the third son of
my mother and fifth child of my father. At the time of my earl-'est
recollections my father was captain of his own boat, lived in his own
house, farmed several acres of good land, had many sheep and cattle, and
kept a man-servant and a horse. We children of the house occupied a very
happy position in the social scale, a position open to all good
influence, high enough to allow us to see about us models of good
manners, of self respect, of piety, and simple dignity. Amply furnished
with all the necessaries of life, we had no reason for shame, as we had
none for p ide. We never knew what chronic underfeeding was, but we were
brought up by the wisest of mothers in a Spartan simplicity of diet,
wholesome and bracing in its effect, which stood my physical frame in
good stead in future years. For us the humble prayer of Agur, “Give me
neither poverty nor riches,” was truly realised.
The branch of the great
clan of which my father, Malcolm Campbell, came was not a direct
offshoot from Argyll, but from Glenorchy, the Marquis of Breadalbane’s
district. The family came to Port Ness from Cape Wrath about the year
1G63. They were the descendants of Kenneth Buey Mclver and his brother
Farquhar, who left Argyllshire about 1560 with a large number of
clansmen, and marched northwards to Caithness, scouring the country as
they went. The details of their history are lost in the haze of
tradition. The early title of my clan was O’Duine, who lived about 1100.
My worthy sire himself
was spare in figure, of active habits, an early riser, and possessed of
much natural shrewdness and warm affection, lie was loud-voiced and
outspoken, sometimes utterly unreserved. This frankness and his
transparent honesty won for him many friends and admirers. Here, it was
felt, was a man who had bravely grappled with life’s earliest problems,
to whom life was no holiday, but a steady march onward and upward to a
goal assured by Christian faith. This brave faith he had no doubt
inherited from his mother, Catherine Bain, who lived a noble Christian
life. In later years, however, his sense of his own unworthiness became
morbid, and his tendency to dwell on the fleetness of life and the
approach of death gradually tinged his thoughts with overmuch of the
Celtic melancholy. As his life ebbed his religious anxieties caused him
much suffering, which saddened his days more or less to the end.
To my mother, nee
Jessie Morrison, I owe everything, even my outward appearance, and
appropriately my name. Her family gave several ministers to the church
at Ness, and after the last of them I am called. She was the daughter of
Allan Morrison, whose greatgrandfather, Roderick Morrison, was titulary
proprietor of Habost and also of Ness. Thus, from time !mmemorial, her
family owned the extreme northern point of the Lewis; and their chief,
Morrison of Habost, for many generations held the honourable position of
hereditary breithcamh, or judge, over the whole of Lewis down to the
year a.d. 1613. The nature of my ancestor’s judgeship is described by
Sir R. Gordon in explaining the office of a breive among the
islanders:—“The breive is a kind of a judge, who hath an absolute
judicatorie, unto whose authoritie and censure they willinglie submit
themselves when he determineth any debateable question between partie
and partie.” * That learned man of law Sir Alexander Morrison, who is
quoted as an authority to the present day, no doubt derived his tastes
from his ancestor, the Ness breive. For a badge the Morrisons have a
drift log, “ sqoidchladaich,” suggested by the logs which the storms of
the Atlantic cast ashore at Ness. No other clan has this badge. Their
coat of arms consists of— argent, three Moors’ heads, couped. sable,
banded of the first; crest, three Saracens’ heads, conjoined in one neck
proper, the faces looking to the chief dexter and sinister sides of the
shield motto, “Pretio prudent;a prsEstat” ("Prudence predominates
overprice”). The tradition attached to this crest and coat of arms tells
how my worthy and rugged ancestor the MacGhillie Mhuire, at the siege of
Acre in 1191, was seen to fly before three Saracens, who attacked him
together. His flight, however, was but a feint, and when he had drawn
them far enough from their supporters, he turned and slew them one by
one. The saying went round the Christian army, “ One More from Scotland
is more than a match for three pagan Mocks,” and from this the heraldic
bearings were devised.
The titular
proprietorship of Habost remained in my mother’s family till her
great-grandfather’s time on the sublet system, which was abolished as
the population increased. The father of this last proprietor deserves a
few words to himself. He was the Hercules of the island, a man of
immense physical proportions and enormous strength. His voice and manner
suggested a constitution of iron and health so impregnable that no
insurance office dealing in life annuities would have ventured to look
him n the face. He was thought good for nine lives at least; there
seemed no possible avenue where death or disease could force a breach.
Yet so poor is the anchorage of human hopes that, amid all these
anticipations, this Scotch granite ancestor of mine suddenly struck his
flag and died at the comparatively earl] age of sixty years. Angus Gunn
had promised him two hundred. He seemed built in an antediluvian type
and for age-long duration, yet he did not reach even the modest span
allotted by the Psalmist.
For the rest the story
of my ancestry rests upon Angus Gunn’s somewhat hazy version, and I do
not propose to give rein to my Celtic imagination in making it more
precise. Being a Scot, I have naturally begun with a pedigree, but the
reader will admit that this is but a very small ell of the genealogical
tree.
During my childhood my
mother suffered for some years from ill-health. But she was still erect,
dignified, graceful in person, and possessed of admirable beauty of
countenance. Her dark eyes had a striking lambency, her smile inspired
love, the habit of her genial mind was to reflect the moods of others
and seek to make them happy, never thinking of herself, and all this she
did with singular tact and a playful, simple grace. Utterly incapable of
servility or obsequiousness, her gifted and lofty nature was always in
peace and charity. Contentment with all around her was stamped upon her
countenance and mien. Yet there was no weakness in her character, and,
like Cromwell's mother, she could exhibit in a marked degree, when other
assistance failed her, the noble faculty of self-help. Such was my
mother, a wise and noble woman. She has passed away like the setting
sun. Suns do not set to die, but to rise again; and so would it be with
the setting sun of what we called the dream and drama of life.
The whirligig of time
goes round, and there comes a truce even to religious disputes. The
disruption agitation which had closed the schools ended at last, and
left calm in the island. But I was in my tenth year before I began to
study the curves and angles of the Roman alphabet. It was by no means an
easy task after several years of truantry to sit quietly most of the day
facing those horrible letters. Many a time I might well have wished that
Cadmus, King of Thebes, had never been born to afflict future
generations in far-off isles of the sea with his abhorred alphabet. My
reason and my imagination lay prisoners, held down by the most depressed
spirt that ever tenanted the frame of a boy. I was not of a disposition,
however, to give in easily, and I fell upon a scheme for making peace
with my tormentors. At play-time I ran to the sea-shore, book and stick
in hand, and drew the outlines of my foes upon the sand. Gradually I
became familiar, nay friendly, with them, and my hatred gave place to a
sense of their usefulness and worth.
I remember one of my
companions who shared my difficulties, but fell upon a very different
scheme for overcoming them. Never was the study of hieroglyphics
attacked by a method so original and so bold. He was not a stupid boy at
play, though bewildered into imbecility by the task of learning. He was
not an ordinary boy, however, and had a pair of ice-coloured, ball-less
eyes, and various other abnormal characteristics, including apparently
the digestion of an ostrich. For one night, being in despair over this
unconquerable alphabet, he carefully cut out the twenty-seven abstruse
symbols, put them inside a piece of dough, and ate them. Alas that the
morning light brought no solution of his difficulties! He never learnt
his letters. Had Nature flung him forth upon the world, with his poor
distracted brain, in some mood of cruel sport, or had she given him a
double share of her own secret, so that he needed no other teacher ?
Perhaps it was so.
Our teacher had of
course been imported from the mainland, and I very soon observed that he
looked upon his pupils as inferior beings. This, of course, made
sympathy impossible between us, and was a serious bar to progress. There
was no compulsory attendance, and only those boys went to school whose
inborn love of knowledge led them to do so of their own free will.
Parents seldom attempted to enforce daily attendance, clinging still to
the primitive idea that the less educated a boy was, the less chance
there was of his leaving the island. The only compulsory item in our
school attendance was the daily contribution of a peat for the
schoolroom fire. The boy who came without his peat under his arm was
absolutely refused admittance.
As for the matter of
his teaching, there was but one subject: the faults of the lately adored
“Auld Kirk” and the perfections of the new regime. Since the days of the
disruption sectarianism racked the whole island. Still the former way of
thinking had its supporters, and there was room for bitter controversy.
People lived at enmity within the same house, sitting at the same
fireside, and probably praying silent, bitter prayers to the same
Providence. But even our instruction In ecclesiastical differences was
soon cut short. One day several of us lingered overlong at our play, and
were late in returning to school. The teacher thereupon assumed his
prerogative of using the “tawse,” and punished us somewhat severely.
Among the culprits were the minister’s children. This outrage on the
dignity of the ministerial office was unpardonable, and the teacher,
unfortunately for him, and also for me, was instantly dismissed. Once
more I was thrown back, and my hopes of learning disappointed just when
they were at their highest. For only a few days before I had, by dint of
hard work, been awarded a prize-book for exceptional diligence in study,
and surely never did man or boy feel more honoured since the days ol
Mordecai the Jew. But again I was to feel the pinch of the shoe, not in
money, but in education.
I was not to be beaten,
however, and I made a firm resolution that a task of reading should be
performed regularly each day. From that day I was my own master and my
own pupil. I had my own thoughts, and faced for myself the problems that
met me. The discipline ol it all was good for me. “The virtue lies in
the struggle, not in the prize.”
As a result of the
religious upheaval in the island the resources of the people had been
heavily drawn upon to provide a new Free Church. A manse was as yet
beyond the reach of the community, and the minister was accommodated in
the house of the miller. In Scotland there is an extraordinary respect
and honour paid to a Free Church minister, the more perhaps because he
is so often a son of the people who has raised himself by his work and
his exertions to this highly esteemed position. The mere accent of the
word “menister” suggests deification, and his presence produces an
effect of awe. Unfortunately the miller proved unworthy of the honour
conferred upon his house, and, what was more serious, unworthy of his
place among a simple, God-fearing, and honest-living folk. When his
offence against the hitherto unimpeachable moral tone of the community
was discovered, he was summoned before the minister and Kirk session and
ruthlessly excommunicated. He was driven from the parish and the island,
and if the will of the minister and Kirk session could have brought it
about, would have been summarily transported to Van Diemen’s Land under
sentence of penal servitude for life, with a strong recommendation for
eternal punishment. “Then gently scan your brother-man” was scarcely the
motto of these stern judges.
That there was a lack
of justice as well as of charily in the local ideas of righteousness was
evident from their appreciation of the new miller. He was a man after
the heart of the religious community,—a Free Kirk elder in whom should
be no guile. Yet in a larger view he can hardly be said to have
obliterated the stain left by his predecessor upon the mill-house. For
he had not been long its tenant before he showed that his special
besetting sin of covetousness was likely to work as much evil as his
predecessor’s. By his influence thirty acres of land were taken at one
stroke from his neighbours without any abatement of rent, and walled
round in solid security. He then sought to evict from this stolen
stronghold of his, two families who had lived there for generations. One
of the cottages belonged to a man called Shiemas Og, and so distracted
with grief was he at the thought of being compelled to leave his home
that his mind became quite unhinged, and for the rest of his life he was
a hopeless lunatic. His wife was compelled to earn a livelihood as she
could, and betook herself to the unlawful practice of shebeening whisky;
while Ian Bain, the other dispossessed cottager, soon found rest in
death. I am far from saying that the elder acted thus because he was an
elder. He was merely one of those who try to serve two masters, and
being keenly conscious that there was a sphere of self-interest as well
as a sphere of religion, he wished to fix an anchor on something that
had promise for the present as well as on assurance for the future.
Yet a religious revival
of extraordinary intensity had accompanied this man’s arrival in the
parish. Daily labours, family duties, all ordinary avocations, were
neglected. For the day of judgment was at hand, bringing with it the end
of all things mortal. The metrical version of the Psalms of David was
studied and repeated with earnestness and zeal, but as for other
reading, what was it but a lie, dishonourable to the Supreme, and
disgraceful .n a professing Christian ? All innocent amusement was
deemed as out of place as a ballet dance during an earthquake. Plato
himself turned Puritan would have felt that too perfect attainment
brings despair when attainment means the laying to heart of the Shorter
Catechism, surely, as it seems to me, the work of befogged theologians
deliberately sitting down to invent an instrument of torture for the
immature intelligence. Very young I had to digest as best I could the
Ten Commandments as given to Moses, and even the stronger meat of
effectual callings and such doctrines. I asked my mother once why all
communicants at the Lord’s Supper were old. “Because they know what they
are doing, and are responsible,” she said. “They are not any better off
than the others,” I replied. “They go at their peril, and if they stay
away, it is at their peril. Tell me how they are saved thus.” I was
promptly sent supperless to bed for my logic.
Yet this revival of
Calvinistic severity had no effect in putting an end to the
superstitions which still lingered among the people. My father, the son,
as I have already said, of a notably Christian mother, Kate Bain, tells
that when he was a young man one of the last duties he had to perform
each evening at twilight was to carry a pot of milk to a hillock hard
by, and pour it over the fairy abodes. There they held high court in
their palace beneath the fairy hill, and from there they sallied forth
at night, to do good or evil according as they had been used: to bake
and spin and work for favoured mortals while they slept; oftener to
wreak revengeful spite on those who had failed to propriate them, and to
carry off the young and fair to their mysterious hillock abodes, around
which weird strains of fairy music might at times be heard.
Of my own knowledge I
can record one serious example of extreme superstition in my own parish.
A young man was very “sweet” upon a maiden, and the “cries” were almost
in view when suddenly his mother turned round on the bride elect, and
openly accused her mother and aunt of witchcraft. They had, she
declared, obtained licence from the devil, and, transformed into hares,
hod sucked the cream from the teats of the cow, carried it home, and
made all the butter they required, and more. The young man, “full of all
subtlety and mischief,” as St. Paul says, was nothing loath to take up
the task of proving his mother in the right. He made two false
assumptions, however, which proved disastrous to his attempts. In the
first place, he took for granted that, as the girl’s mother was lame, he
would know her even in hare shape by this peculiarity; and, in the
second place, he believed that the girl still loved him enough to save
him from being torn to pieces by the witches, whom she would no doubt
accompany in order to learn the dark art. One evening, as he set off to
court another girl, two witch hares and a leveret met him, which
compelled a hasty retreat. After arming himself with a boat’s helm, he
undauntedly set out again to the new ground of his choice. But he had
not gone far before the witches made a second attack, and before they
had done with him they tore out by the roots every hair that God had
planted on his big head. He was afterwards carried, more dead than
alive, to a neighbour’s house, where he slept twice round the clock, so
great was the relief after the night’s tension. Cunningly he shaved
himself to support his mother’s superstition, but nature betrayed his
scheme by a copious growth of hair.
Tales of this kind sort
badly with the tenets of strict Calvinism, but these simple islanders
found room in their believing hearts for both. Witchcraft is older than
Calvinism. It has had a longer hold on the minds of men. The historical
research of our own day has failed to find its origin. It has been with
the human race from the beginning.
The world is indeed a
slow learner. Happily it has an infinitely patient Teacher. Happily,
too, we have the assurance that things are moving towards a glorious
consummation when superstition and error shall be driven away, and when
God shall reconcile all things unto Himself, whether they be things in
earth or things in heaven.
But if superstition did
not retreat before religion, education did. The schools were closed.
Once more, as had happened before, our juvenile energy was frittered
away on unintelligible metaphysics and theology when we ought to have
been acquiring a solid grounding in reading, writing, and arithmetic.
The monotony of the continual “ spiritual” instruction became well-nigh
unbearable. It produced a kind of intellectual squint, and utterly
deadened the imagination. It was especially hard on such a temperament
as mine, for I was always of a romantic turn and saw realities through a
glamour of my own creating. I lived in a future of my own imagining—a
future of far travel and strange experience, for which it was my whole
longing and desire to prepare myself. Yet knowledge seemed to be refused
me, and despairing presentiments darkened my whole life at this period,
though never without intermittent dashes of hope. All my experience of
life leads me to believe with Goethe that our wishes are but the
expression of our capacities and harbingers of our future attainments.
The “Auld Kirk-’ had
become anathema maranatha to the people, for the Free Church were eager
to find another God for themselves by mental or spiritual process!
Indeed, we were always on the qui vive for a spiritual convulsion. That
the social state of the entire community was truly indescribable goes
without saying, and I mentally anathematise the day in which I was born.
From the grand humanism
of the minister down to the fancies of whimsical mystics, who hold that
it is even a sin to wear garments, and believe that heaven is only about
six miles off, we had a little more than enough religion to make us
hate, but not enough to make us love, one another. The very whisper of
the “Auld Kirk” intoxicated the people and deprived them of all
faculties of examination and judgment. Why, it seemed to my youthful
intelligence but a day of wrath, the true gospel of charity for the
moment being sealed. Nay, I go farther, that if any man had lost his
religion, let him repair to this sland, and I warrant him he would find
;t. On the other hand, I had almost said, too, if any man had a
religion, let him but come hither, and I warrant him also he would go
pretty near to lose it. Nevertheless the spirit of religion bloweth
where it listeth, like the wind. We cannot tell whence it cometh or
whither it goeth. It would not be religion if we could calculate it and
reduce it to measure, not because the Divine nature is what it is, but
because human nature is what it is. I see before me the ancient Church
of St. Peter and the Temple of St. Thomas, whose crumbled walls have had
shelter from the arctic blasts, behind the high black granite rocky
ledges of the Butt, for countless years. Their architects, builders, and
worshippers—pagan, Druidical, and Christian—have passed away with their
different views of the gods they served, in accordance with the
inexorable laws of nature, in the unwritten history of their time. We
must follow them in our harsh Calvinistic views of God, whose nature is
all love and tenderness. But these crumbling walls remain, which are
now, by an unknown instinct, made immortal, if not classic, by one born
out of season. Tradition says that both were built by means of the sin
of Sabbath-breaking, the islanders having begun that process from the
year in which St. Columba visited the island, and continued it
successfully for centuries. In those early times those who felt a
necessary duty, or an overmastering desire to milk or even graze their
cows on Sundays, had to pay a toll to the Church for permission to sin.
Alas! with all our religion, persons now desirous of breaking the
Sabbath here may learn from this that they can do so without licence or
toll. It will be nothing short of a miracle if the full depth of this
change has not yet to be plumbed, and it a few disagreeable surprises
are not still n store for the gullible “Auld Kirk”—going away from God
to God!
Once more my hopes were
raised high by the unexpected arrival of a second teacher. Alas! his
teaching was but a drop in the ocean. His system was the same as his
predecessor’s, and his fate not unlike. This time the ground of his
dismissal was some sectarian bitterness, arising directly from the
presence of the minister’s son in the school. Assuredly that Free Church
Moses of ours had a wonderful influence, and in his son we felt that he
had brought an “olive branch” which, by some malign miracle, was turned
’nto a fiery serpent. He may have had the theology of Thomas Aquinas and
the wisdom of Aristotle, but he was certainly sadly lacking in tact and
taste. There was no originality in his views, though much Scotch
shrewdness and humour in the language in which he clothed them. But,
whatever the cause, his power over the people was extraordinary. Humour
under control is a valuable element in a minister, and many will admit
that the sense of humour in private intercourse is even good. It is
pathetic to think, however, what crises would have been tided over, and
what “removals” avoided, if only ministers had sometimes been readier
for amusement than vexation. Yet the people are to blame, the crazy
fanatics, the hard children of this world. He came to the parish
something after the fashion that James Nayler rode into Bristol in 1656.
This is not, perhaps, a very becoming way to speak of a man, but let me
assure the reader, there is more lucidity than intentional disrespect in
the phrase. |