Disembarking in the
year 1675 on that soil where as apostolic vicar he had already
accomplished so much good, giving his episcopal benediction to that
Christian throng who came to sing the Te Deum to thank God for the happy
return of their first pastor, casting his eyes upon that manly and
imposing figure of one of the most illustrious lieutenants of the great
king, the Count de Frontenac, what could be the thoughts of Mgr. de
Laval? He could not deceive himself: the letters received from Canada
proved to him too clearly that the friction between the civil powers and
religious authorities would be continued under a governor of
uncompromising and imperious character. With what fervour must he have
asked of Heaven the tact, the prudence and the patience so necessary in
such delicate circumstances
Two questions,
especially, divided the governor and the bishop: that of the permanence
of livings, and the everlasting matter of the sale of brandy to the
savages, a question which, like the phoenix, was continually reborn from
its ashes. " The prelate," says the Abbe Gosselin, "desired to establish
parishes wherever they were necessary, and procure for them good and
zealous missionaries, and, as far as possible, priests residing in each
district, but removable and attached to the seminary, which received the
tithes and furnished them with all they had need of. But Frontenac found
that this system left the priests too dependent on the bishop, and that
the clergy thus closely connected with the bishop and the seminary, was
too formidable and too powerful a body. It was with the purpose of
weakening it and of rendering it, by the aid which it would require,
more dependent on the civil authority, that he undertook that campaign
for permanent livings which ended in the overthrow of Mgr. de Laval's
system."
Colbert, in fact, was
too strongly prejudiced against the clergy of Canada by the reports of
Talon and Frontenac. These three men were wholly devoted to the
interests of France as well as to those of the colony, but they judged
things only from a purely human point of view. " I see," Colbert wrote
in 1677 to Commissioner Duchesneau, " that the Count de Frontenac is of
the opinion that the trade with the savages in drinks, called in that
country intoxicating, does not cause the great and terrible evils to
which Mgr. de Quebec takes exception, and even that it is necessary for
commerce; and I see that you are of an opinion contrary to this. In this
matter, before taking sides with the bishop, you should enquire very
exactly as to the number of murders, assassinations, cases of arson, and
other excesses caused by brandy . . . and send me the proof of this. If
these deeds had been continual, His Majesty would have issued a most
severe and vigorous prohibition to all his subjects against engaging in
this traffic. But, in the absence of this proof, and seeing, moreover,
the contrary in the evidence and reports of those that have been longest
in this country, it is not just, and the general policy of a state
opposes in this the feelings of a bishop who, to prevent the abuses that
a small number of private individuals may make of a thing good in
itself, wishes to abolish trade in an article which greatly serves to
attract commerce, and the savages themselves, to the orthodox
Christians." Thus M. Dudouyt could not but fail in his mission, and he
wrote to Mgr. de Laval that Colbert, while recognizing very frankly the
devotion of the bishop and the missionaries, believed that they
exaggerated the fatal results of the traffic. The zealous collaborator
of the Bishop of Quebec at the same time urged the prelate to suspend
the spiritual penalties till then imposed upon the traders, in order to
deprive the minister of every motive of bitterness against the clergy.
The bishop admitted the
wisdom of this counsel, which he followed, and meanwhile the king,
alarmed by a report from Commissioner Duchesneau, who shared the view of
the missionaries, desired to investigate and come to a final decision on
the question. He therefore ordered the Count de Frontenac to choose in
the colony twenty-four competent persons, and to commission them to
examine the drawbacks to the sale of intoxicating liquors.
Unfortunately, the persons chosen for this enquiry were engaged in trade
with the savages; their conclusions must necessarily be prejudiced. They
declared that " very few disorders arose from the traffic in brandy,
among the natives of the country; that, moreover, the Dutch, by
distributing intoxicating drinks to the Iroquois, attracted by this
means the trade in beaver skins to Orange and Manhattan. It was,
therefore, absolutely necessary to allow the brandy trade in order to
bring the savages into the French colony and to prevent them from taking
their furs to foreigners."
We cannot help being
surprised at such a judgment when we read over the memoirs of the time,
which all agree in deploring the sad results of this traffic. The most
crying injustice, the most revolting immorality, the ruin of families,
settlements devastated by drunkenness, agriculture abandoned, the robust
portion of the population ruining its health in profitless expeditions:
such were some of the most horrible fruits of alcohol. And what do we
find as a compensation for so many evils ? A few dozen rascals enriched,
returning to squander in France a fortune shamefully acquired. And let
it not be objected that, if the Indians had not been able to purchase
the wherewithal to satisfy their terrible passion for strong drink, they
would have carried their furs to the English or the Dutch, for it was
proven that the offer of Governor Andros, to forbid the sale of brandy
to the savages in New England on condition that the French would act
likewise in New France, was formally rejected. " To-day when the
passions of the time have long been silent," says the Abbe Ferland, " it
is impossible not to admire the energy displayed by the noble bishop,
imploring the pity of the monarch for the savages of New France with all
the courage shown by Las Casas, when he pleaded the cause of the
aborigines of Spanish America. Disdaining the hypocritical outcries of
those men who prostituted the name of commerce to cover their
speculations and their rapine, he exposed himself to scorn and
persecution in order to save the remnant of those indigenous American
tribes, to protect his flock from the moral contagion which threatened
to weigh upon it, and to lead into the right path the young men who were
going to ruin among the savage tribes."
The worthy bishop
desired to prevent the laxity of the sale of brandy that might result
from the declaration of the Committee of Twenty-four, and in the autumn
of 1678 he set out again for France. To avoid a journey so fatiguing, he
might easily have found excuses in the rest needed after a difficult
pastoral expedition which he had just concluded, in the labours of his
seminary which demanded his presence, and especially in the bad state of
his health; but is not the first duty of a leader always to stand in the
breach, and to give to all the example of self-sacrifice ? A report from
his hand on the disorders caused by the traffic in strong liquors would
perhaps have obtained a fortunate result, but thinking that his presence
at the court would be still more efficacious, he set out. He managed to
find in his charity and the goodness of his heart such eloquent words to
depict the evils wrought upon the Church in Canada 'by the scourge of
intoxication, that Louis XIV was moved, and commissioned his confessor,
Father La Chaise, to examine the question conjointly with the Archbishop
of Paris. According to their advice, the king expressly forbade the
French to carry intoxicating liquors to the savages in their dwellings
or in the woods, and he wrote to Frontenac to charge him to see that the
edict was respected. On his part, Laval consented to maintain the castle
reserve only against those who might infringe the royal prohibition. The
Bishop of Quebec had hoped for more; for nothing could prevent the
Indians from coming to buy the terrible poison from the French, and
moreover, discovery of the infractions of the law would be, if not
impossible, at least most difficult. Nevertheless, it was an advantage
obtained over the dealers and their protectors, who aimed at nothing
less than an unrestricted traffic in brandy. A dyke was set up against
the devastations of the scourge; the worthy bishop might hope to
maintain it energetically by his vigilance and that of his coadjutors.
Unfortunately, he could not succeed entirely, and little by little the
disorders became so multiplied that M. de Denonville considered brandy
as one of the greatest evils of Canada, and that the venerable superior
of St. Sulpice de Montreal, M. Dollier de Casson, wrote in 1691: "I have
been twenty-six years in this country, and I have seen our numerous and
flourishing Algonquin missions all destroyed by drunkenness."
Accordingly, it became necessary later to fall back upon the former
rigorous regulations against the sale of intoxicating liquors to the
Indians.
Before his departure
for France the Bishop of Quebec had given the devoted priests of St.
Sulpice a mark of his affection: he constituted the parish of Notre-Dame
de Montreal according to the canons of the Church, and joined it in
perpetuity to the Seminary of Ville-Marie, "to be administered, under
the plenary authority of the Bishops of Quebec, by such ecclesiastics as
might be chosen by the superior of the said seminary. The priests of St.
Sulpice having by their efforts and their labours produced during so
many years in New France, and especially in the Island of Montreal, very
great fruits for the glory of God and the advantage of this growing
Church, we have given them, as being most irreproachable in faith,
doctrine, piety and conduct, in perpetuity, and do give them, by virtue
of these presents, the livings of the Island of Montreal, in order that
they may be perfectly cultivated as up to now they have been, as best
they might be by their preachings and examples." In fact,
misunderstandings like that which had occurred on the arrival of de
Queylus were no longer to be feared; since the authority to which Laval
could lay claim had been duly established and proved, the Sulpicians had
submitted and accepted his jurisdiction. They had for a longer period
preserved their independence as temporal lords, and the governor of
Ville-Marie, de Maison-neuve, jealous of preserving intact the rights of
those whom he represented, even dared one day to refuse the keys of the
fort to the governor-general, M. dArgenson. Poor de Maisonneuve paid for
this excessive zeal by the loss of his position, for d'Argenson never
forgave him.
The parish of
Notre-Dame was united with the Seminary of Montreal on October 30th,
1678, one year after the issuing of the letters patent which recognized
the civil existence of St. Sulpice de Montreal. Mgr. de Laval at the
same time united with the parish of Notre-Dame the chapel of Bonsecours.
On the banks of the St. Lawrence, not far from the church of Notre-Dame,
rises a chapel of modest appearance. It is Notre-Dame de Bonsecours. It
has seen many generations kneeling on its square, and has not ceased to
protect with its shadow the Catholic quarter of Montreal. The buildings
about it rose successively, only to give way themselves to other
monuments. Notre-Dame de Bonsecours is still respected; the piety of
Catholics defends it against all attacks of time or progress, and the
little church raises proudly in the air that slight wooden steeple that
more than once has turned aside the avenging bolt of the Most High.
Sister Bourgeoys had begun it in 1657; to obtain the funds necessary for
its completion she betook herself to Paris. She obtained one hundred
francs from M. Mac£, a priest of St. Sulpice. One of the associates of
the Company of Montreal, M. de Fan-camp, received for her from two of
his fellow-partners, MM. Denis and Lepretre, a statuette of the Virgin
made of the miraculous wood of Montagu, and he himself, to participate
in this gift, gave her a shrine of the most wonderful richness to
contain the precious statue. On her return to Canada, Marguerite
Bourgeoys caused to be erected near the house Of the Sisters a wooden
lean-to in the form of a chapel, which became the provisional sanctuary
of the statuette. Two years later, on June 29th, the laying of the
foundation stone of the chapel took place. The work was urged with
enthusiasm, and encouraged by the pious impatience of Sister Bourgeoys.
The generosity of the faithful vied in enthusiasm, and gifts flowed in.
M. de Maisonneuve offered a cannon, of which M. Souart had a bell made
at his expense. Two thousand francs, furnished by the piety of the
inhabitants, and one hundred louis from Sister Bourgeoys and her nuns,
aided the foundress to complete the realization of a wish long cherished
in her heart; the new chapel became an inseparable annex of the parish
of Ville-Marie.
These most precious
advantages were recognized on November 6th, 1678, by Mgr. de Laval, who
preserved throughout his life the most tender devotion to the Mother of
God. On the other hand, the prelate imposed upon the parish priest the
obligation of having the Holy Mass celebrated there on the Day of the
Visitation, and of going there in procession on the Day of the
Assumption. Is it necessary to mention with what zeal, with what
devotion the Canadians brought to Mary in this new temple their homage
and their prayers? Let us listen to the enthusiastic narrative of Sister
Morin, a nun of St. Joseph: "The Holy Mass is said there every day, and
even several times a day, to satisfy the devotion and the trust of the
people, which are great towards Notre-Dame de Bonse-cours. Processions
wend their way thither on occasions of public need or calamity, with
much success. It is the regular promenade of the devout persons of the
town, who make a pilgrimage there every evening, and there are few good
Catholics who, from all the places in Canada, do not make vows of
offerings to this chapel in all the dangers in which they find
themselves."
The church of
Notre-Dame de Bonsecours was twice remodelled; built at first of oak on
stone foundations, it was rebuilt of stone and consumed in 1754 in a
conflagration which destroyed a part of the town. In 1772 the chapel was
rebuilt as it exists now, one hundred and two feet long by forty-six
wide. |