LORD John Russell, in a
despatch of July 24th, had announced to the governor-general that the
royal assent had been given to the Union Bill, and asked him to prepare
for the introduction of constitutional government according to that Act.
The Union Act permitted for the first time in Canada, or indeed in any
colony, a representative assembly to control the voting of supplies,
while the executive government alone introduced money bills and was
charged with the administration of the government, including the
appointment of all officials. Hitherto "in many of our colonies these
functions have been mixed or reversed, to the great injury of the public
weal."
The passing of the
Union Act also involved the issue of a new commission to the governor of
the united province. As it was understood, however, that the governor's
commission could not be issued before the appointment of the legislative
and executive councils, Poulett Thomson was asked to send home
nominations for these positions. Moreover, the governor's commission and
the royal instructions which always accompanied it, would determine in
many important respects the manner in which the powers conferred under
the Union Act were to be exercised. But the forms of the governor's
commission and the royal instructions had been but slightly altered
since 1791, and as the home government was naturally not very familiar
with local Canadian conditions, Poulett Thomson was invited to furnish
suggestions for his own commission and instructions,—a unique mark of
confidence evidently due to his former connection with the government. A
new seal for the province was also reported to be in process of
execution.
This juncture in the
country's affairs and hi the fortunes of the governor-general was
naturally regarded as the fitting occasion on which to acknowledge the
important and effective services which Poulett Thomson had already
rendered in connection with the union of the Canadas and the re-establishinent
of colonial government upon a stable basis. Hence, before the issue of
his new commission as governor-general, Poulett Thomson was elevated to
the peerage with the title of Baron Sydenham of Sydenham in Kent and
Toronto in Canada.
As already indicated, a
few measures still remained to be brought before the Special Council
before the consummation of the union. For the consideration of these
Lord Sydenham, immediately after his return from the west, summoned, for
the last time, the members of the Special Council. The most important
measure to come before it was an ordinance for the establishment of
municipal institutions, though the governor-general had not expected to
bring this before any legislative body in Canada. The draft bill for the
union of the Canadas which he had sent to the colonial secretary
contained full provision for a municipal system. The importance which
Lord Sydenham attached to this feature of the Union Bill is thus
vigorously expressed on learning that these clauses were in danger of
being dropped, " No man in his senses would think for a moment of the
Union without its being accompanied by some sort of Local Government, in
which the people may control their own officers, and the executive at
the same time obtain some influence in the country districts.
"Without a breakwater
of this kind between the Central Government and the people, Government
with an Assembly is impossible in Lower Canada, and most difficult in
Upper Canada; and it is absurd to expect that any good system can or
will be established by the Provincial Legislature, even if time admitted
of its being proposed to them. No colonial legislature will divest
itself of the great power it now possesses of parcelling out sums of
money for every petty local job; and although by the Union Bin the
initiative of money votes will be confined to the Government, this
provision will become null, because the moment that the executive is
called upon to provide for all these local expenses, with the details of
which it cannot be acquainted, it must renounce the task, and leave it
in the hands of the members themselves. A distinct principle must be
laid down that all purely local expenses be borne by the localities
themselves, settled and voted by them, and that only great works be paid
for out of the provincial funds.
"Nor is it only with
reference to the Canadas that it was all-important for Parliament itself
to have laid down the principle and details of Local Government. Since I
have been in these Provinces, I have become more and more satisfied that
the capital cause of the misgovernment of them is to be found in the
absence of Local Government, and the consequent exercise by the Assembly
of powers wholly inappropriate to its functions. Members are everywhere
chosen only with reference to the extent of job for their particular
district which they can carry. Whoever happens to lead a party in the
House of twelve or fourteen members, may at once obtain a majority for
his political views by jobbing with other members for votes upon them,
or, by rejecting their jobs as the penalty of refusal, oust them from
their seats. This, indeed, is admitted by the best men of all parties,
and especially of the popular side. Rut it is equally admitted that they
cannot of themselves change the system. In both Nova Scotia and New
Brunswick I was told that if Parliament laid down a system of Local
Government for Canada, then it was likely that in these Provinces too
the Assembly would adopt it; but, without that, it would be impossible
to get it done. So, by this step, if Lord John has really been forced to
take it, not only has all chance of the Union Rill working well been
destroyed, but also the hope of a change of system throughout all the
Provinces. Last year, if you remember, we made it a sine qua non to the
Union; indeed, our scheme was altogether based on it. The establishment
of Municipal Government by Act of Parliament is as much a part of the
intended scheme of Government for the Canadas as the union of the two
Legislatures, and the more important of the two. All chance of good
Government, in Lower Canada especially, depends on its immediate
adoption."
But when the Union Rill
came before the British parliament it was found that there were such
strong objections to the municipal clauses in it that Lord John Russell
considered it expedient to drop them rather than jeopardize the whole
measure. In his despatch to Sydenham, September 14th, he declared that
"nothing but a wish to prevent a division among those who supported the
Union Rill, induced me to refrain from pressing the municipal clauses on
the House of Commons.'' And in a later despatch, when he had received
Lord Sydenham's remonstrances on the omission of the municipal clauses,
he explained that, on the one hand, he could find no Canadian authority
in support of them, while Peel and Stanley, though friendly enough to
the general union measure, strongly opposed its municipal features, as
did also Mr. Gillespie and others well acquainted with Canada. Lord
Sydenham received formal instructions, however, to bring before the
united legislature the question of municipal government, "in such form
and manner as you shall judge most advisable for the attainment of an
object to which Her Majesty's government attach the highest value."
Accordingly, Lord
Sydenham took advantage of the closing session of the Special Council to
introduce a general municipal system into Lower Canada, outside of the
cities of Quebec and Montreal already provided for by special
ordinances. This was accomplished through an " Ordinance to provide for
the better internal Government of this Province by the establishment of
Local and Municipal Authorities therein." Partly out of respect for the
prejudices of those who balked at dangerous democratic innovations, and
partly that the central government might hold the leading-strings while
the infant municipal authorities learned to walk, the central government
retained considerable control over the official appointments and
financial obligations of the new municipalities. Lord Sydenham was
strongly impressed with the necessity for thus providing numerous local
schools for the training of the people in the elements of responsible
government. Up to this stage, as he had 270 observed, the people had
received no training in those habits of self-government which were so
necessary in enabling them to properly choose their representatives in
parliament; nor was there any opportunity furnished for testing at close
range the talents and quality of candidates for seats in the
legislature. Having little or no experience of the difficulties of
government, the common people were inclined to blame the central
authorities for all that went wrong in purely local affairs.
When we think of the
pressure put upon the Dominion and provincial governments at the present
time for the construction of local works, and the consequent temptation
to the bribery of constituencies, we can understand what Lord S3'denham
saved the country, when, for the combined provinces of Quebec and
Ontario, he relieved the central government of responsibility and
patronage in the case of the multifarious works and services which were
devolved upon the district councils created under his comprehensive
municipal system. The system was afterwards extended, with a few
amendments, to Upper Canada, under an Act of the united legislature. An
outline of the system will be given when we refer to the general
municipal Act.
Another important
measure dealt with at this last session of the Special Council, related
to the establishment of offices for the registration of titles to land.
This had been the occasion of almost as great debate in Lower Canada as
the Clergy Reserves in Upper Canada. It had been the subject of much
enquiring and reporting, and many bills had been introduced to deal with
it. In the important report of 1828 the whole matter had been thoroughly
gone into. It had been shown that a serious drawback to the province of
Lower Canada was involved in the system of secret and implied
mortgages—" Hijpotkcques tactics et occultes" — which rendered it almost
impossible to be certain of a clear title to any lands which might be
purchased. Ancient French laws and customs, born of a social system of
rigid caste and changeless ownership, formed part of that " nationality
" inherited at the conquest, which, in the struggle for the maintenance
of French ascendency after the Quebec Act, was to be rendered even more
changeless than in the least progressive days before the French
Revolution. The more complete the demonstration of its obstructive
character, the more obstinately did the typical French-Canadian cling to
it and anathematize the tyranny of those who would change, in other
words anglicize, his institutions. Yet the commercial and progressive
French-Canadians were prepared to welcome the change, once safely made.
In the latter part of November, Lord Sydenham was able to report, "I
have got a registry bill, 'the ass's bridge' of the Province for the
last twenty years, which meets with nearly universal assent from both
French and English. It will be law in a few days, and will be really a
miracle." The range and purpose of the new ordinance are sufficiently
indicated in the title and preamble:—
"An Ordinance to
prescribe and regulate the Registering of Titles to Lands, Tenements and
Hereditaments, Real or Immovable Estates, and of Charges and
Incumbrances on the same; and for the Alteration and Improvement of the
Law in certain Particulars in Relation to the Alienation and
Hypothecation of Real Estates and the Rights and Interest acquired
therein.
"Whereas great losses
and evils have been experienced from secret and fraudulent conveyances
of real estates, and incumbrances on the same, and from the uncertainty
and insecurity of titles of lands in this province, to the manifest
injury and occasional ruin of purchasers, creditors, and others ; and
whereas the registering of all titles to real or immovable estates, and
of all charges and incumbrances on the same, would not only obviate
these losses and evils for the future, but would also, with some
alteration of the existing laws, whereby the removal of inconvenient and
inexpedient restraints and burthens on the alienation of real estates
might be effected, greatly promote the agricultural and commercial
interests of this province, and advance its improvement and prosperity :
etc."
There were altogether
some thirty-two additional ordinances passed at this last session of the
Special Council, relating to such important interests as highways,
harbours and navigation, railways, regulations respecting aliens, the
erection of gaols arid the administration of justice. In consequence of
these exacting legislative duties, which occupied the attention of the
governor until February, 1841, the proclamation of the union, the
organization of the new government, and the provision for the election
of the first legislature for united Canada were unduly delayed, much to
the chagrin of Lord Sydenham, who naturally desired as much time as
possible to prepare his legislative programme.
The problem as to the
seat of government had already been discussed by Lord Sydenham in a
private and confidential despatch of May 22nd, 1840. There were five
different places whose claims were canvassed, Quebec, Montreal,
Kingston, Toronto and Bytown, now Ottawa. The latter was eliminated
almost immediately, for, though remote from the frontier, it was also
remote from the more settled portions of the country and afforded no
suitable accommodation. From the point of view of immediate
accommodation, Toronto and Quebec were naturally best equipped, but both
were too far removed from the centre of the united province. Toronto, in
addition, was incapable of defence and in winter shut off from regular
communication with Britain. It had been urged, apparently by
representatives of Quebec and Toronto, that the legislature might meet
alternately in the two provinces, which was fareefied into the
proposition that the capital should be planed on a scow and towed around
to the leading cities in rotation. The final choice lay between Montreal
and Kingston. From the point of view of defence, Kingston was the safer;
as regards communication with Britain, Montreal was nearer in summer and
Kingston in winter, via New York. Montreal was the larger and more
important city, Kingston the more centrally located for the whole
province. Judged from the existing requirements, their claims were about
equally balanced, but having regard to the future development of the
country, Kingston had undoubtedly the advantage. Moreover, Sydenham
frankly confessed that he considered it desirable that the capital of
the province and the sittings of the legislature should be removed from
the presence of a large French population, and especially from the
influence of a host of petty lawyers and doctors, such as filled the
Montreal district and had already created trouble. On the other hand, it
would be of advantage to the French-Canadian members to bring them into
an English section of the province with a new social and political
atmosphere. On the whole, therefore, he gave the preference to Kingston.
Replying to his despatch on the subject, Lord John Russell quite
approved of Sydenham's reasons for fixing upon Kingston. It was not,
however, until the beginning of February, 1841, that it became publicly
known that Kingston was to be the capital of the united province.
By an Order-in-Council,
dated August 10th, 1840, Lord Sydenham had been vested with authority to
proclaim the union. Not, however, until February 5th, 1841, did he find
it possible to issue his proclamation appointing February 10th as the
date on which the union of the provinces should take effect. This date
was chosen as the conjunction of several anniversaries; those, namely,
of the marriage of the Queen, the Treaty of Paris, 1703, the giving of
the royal assent to the Act suspending the constitution of Lower Canada,
and the proroguing of the legislature of Upper Canada the previous year.
Accordingly, oil that date Lord Sydenham assumed the office of
Captain-General and Governor-in-Chief of the United Province, according
to the forms prescribed in his commission. At the same time, he issued a
proclamation to the people of the united province with the object of
impressing upon them the privileges and responsibilities which were
conferred upon them, and the great future which was in store for the
country should these opportunities be properly utilized. " In your hands
now rests your own fate, and by the use which you will make of the
opportunity must it be decided."
On February 15th Lord
Sydenham issued a proclamation summoning the parliament of United Canada
to meet at Kingston. The election writs were returnable on April 8th,
and he hoped to assemble the parliament on May 26th, when the water
routes, the chief highways of the country, would be open. The date of
opening the legislature was afterwards postponed to June 14th. He had
already nominated as members of the executive council the principal
officers of the late provincial governments: namely, Messrs. H. B.
Sullivan, J. H. Dunn, D. Daly, S. B. Harrison, C. R. Ogclen, W. R.
Draper, R. Baldwin, and C, D. Day. The only appointments to office,
however, were Mr. Daly, the late provincial secretary of Lower Canada,
and Mr. Harrison, late civil secretary of Upper Canada, to be
secretaries for the united province; and Mr. Dunn, late receiver-general
of Upper Canada, to be receiver-general of the united province. These
appointments were indispensable to the carrying on of the business of
the country.
As has been already
indicated, the frankly avowed object of the Union Act was, without
infringing upon the personal rights or religious convictions of the
French-Canadians, to do away with the eternal conflict for racial
supremacy by insuring to the country a British future as regards its
national institutions and imperial connection. In order to accomplish
this, it was necessary to equalize the power of the two races in such a
way that, under representative institutions and responsible government,
there would be a reasonable assurance of a British majority in the
legislature. That did not imply that party divisions would necessarily
follow racial lines; indeed it was fully expected that this would
prevent such a result, and this soon proved to be the case. It was well
known that any possible form of settlement would be, for a time,
unpalatable to the French-Canadians. Even the least objectionable of
all, and the most hopeful for the future—that involved in the union
policy—was certain to give occasion to the demagogues to stir the
liveliest apprehension of the ignorant masses of the people as to the
inevitable oppression and loss of civil and religious liberty which were
to follow the consummation of the union. The general body of the
French-Canadians knew nothing of how Lord Sydenham had defended their
rights, as against the extreme demands 'of the ultra-loyal element in
the Upper Province, and to a certain extent m the Lower Province as
well, or-the criticisms he had received in consequence. Hence it was
easy to persuade them, as was industriously done, that he was their
avowed enemy and oppressor; as the promoter of the union measure he was
the author of all the apprehended evils which were to How from it.
As Lord Sydenham had
feared, confirmation of the popular opinion of the governor was drawn
from the fixing of the electoral limits of Quebec aud Montreal. In order
to give the important British mercantile element an opportunity for
representation amid an encircling majority of French-Canadians, portions
of the suburbs of these cities were thrown in with the adjoining
counties. What, however, gave this an especially sinister look in the
eyes of the French-Canadians, was the fact that, mainly on the
representation of Sir Robert Peel, then leader of the Opposition in the
British parliament, these seats were given two representatives each.
Lord Sydenham immediately recognized how this would be interpreted, and
thus referred to the awkward position in which it placed him:—
"I had suggested that
one Member should be given to each of the cities of Quebec and Montreal,
and under proper regulation and without any great appearance of
injustice the probability is that a member really representing the
Commercial Interest might have been returned in this way for each City.
In consequence, however, of the representations of different Canadian
Merchants in London, H. M. Government and Parliament deemed it expedient
to allot two Members to each of these Cities, the consequence of which
is, that if the limits of the two places are not restricted in a way
which may be represented to be extremely unjust with regard to the
number of voters to be retained for the nomination of so many as four
Members, the object which I had m view, and which Parliament, in
ignorance of the real state of the case, sought to carry still farther,
namely, the return of such representatives, will be entirely defeated,
and the Mercantile Interest of Quebec and Montreal will have no more
voice in the choice of their members-than they would in the nomination
of any of the Members for the French counties. This is highly
embarrassing, and another proof, )f one were wanting, of the danger of
meddling with details when the parties doing so are imperfectly informed
of the facts. After mature consideration, however, I have determined to
carry out what I consider to have been the views of Parliament and, at
whatever risk of outcry or accusation, to make such an apportionment of
the limits of these two cities, by excluding the whole or the greater
part of their suburbs, as shall effectually secure to the trading
community the power of returning the representatives of their choice,
not looking indeed to Politics, or to race, but to a commercial
representation such as was sought by Sir Robert Peel in his proposal for
giving a nomination to the Chambers of Commerce. Your Lordship, however,
may expect that this course will be objected to by the French-Canadian
population and some of their supporters, and probably the objections may
find advocates in Parliament in England. It is, therefore, my duty to
state to you the necessity which compels me to adopt it, and I trust
that a sufficient answer will be given in case I am attacked for it." |