In Canada and the Indian
Territories Between the Tears 1760 and 1776 By Alexander Henry, Fur
Trader. New Edition, Edited with Notes, Illustrative and Biographical,
by James Bain (1901)
Editors Preface
Alexander Henry was
born in New Jersey in August, 1739. His parents were reputable people in
the middle rank of life, who are said to have come from the West of
England, and to have been connected with Matthew Henry, the Biblical
commentator. Of his early days nothing is known, but it is evident from
his book and from the position he assumed in official and commercial
circles that he received a good English education. When we first make
his acquaintance he was in his twenty-first year, and had joined
Amherst’s army, not as a soldier, but in a “premature attempt to share
in the fur trade of Canada, directly on the conquest of the country.”
Wolfe’s victory at Quebec in the previous year had awakened the English
traders to the opportunity presented, of taking over the fur trade which
the French had opened up, and Amherst’s large army was watched with
great interest as it swept away the last remnant of French control. The
“Travels and Adventures” which followed “occupy a period of sixteen
years, commencing nearly with the author’s setting out in life.” It is
improbable that his first acquaintance with the character and
requirements of this particular trade was to be made on the banks of the
St. Lawrence, and we may safely assume that he had had some previous
knowledge of it in one of the trading establishments at Albany or New
York.
In Boston, in 1766, a book of 160 pages was published, entitled “Account
of the Captivity of William Henry in 1765, and of his residence among
the Senneka Indians six years and seven months, till he made his escape
from them” which may be an explanation of his introduction to the fur
trade. Of this book no copy seems to be known. It cannot be traced in
the catalogues of any of the great American or English libraries, and is
not to be found in the bibliographies of Sabine, Rich, Field or Pilling.
Of William Henry we only know that he was a trader with the Ohio
Indians, and was made prisoner by the Senecas, and in the absence of his
book have no means of tracing him, but the name is not a common one. At
the time of William’s captivity, Alexander was sixteen years old. It is
not improbable that the first named was a near relative, perhaps uncle,
and that Alexander had been by him introduced to the trade while very
young, and that finding William did not return after four years absence,
had ventured what goods he possessed in an expedition on his own
account. The case is strengthened, also, by the fact that Henry’s eldest
son, born long after in Montreal, was named William, and that about 1787
a nephew named Alexander Henry, Jr., joined him there, who afterward
became himself a noteworthy North-Wester, and whose journals have
recently been most copiously edited by the late Elliott Coues. But
whatever had been his connection with trading, previous to his setting
out, it is quite evident that he had not spent much time among the
Indians from his own statement' that “a bark canoe was a vehicle to
which I was altogether a stranger” as well as to the snow-shoes, “an
article of equipment which I never used before.” In the London Chronicle
of June 23rd and 25th, 1768, are given two extracts from William Henry’s
book which exhibit a similar interest in the mental and social condition
of the Indians to that which characterizes Alexander Henry’s writings,
and as they are apparently the only portions now extant, they are worth
reprinting.
“This writer, who is an Englishman, gives a plain short account of his
education in human learning at an academy in Northampton; his settlement
in America, as a trader with the Ohio Indians; his being surprised and
made a prisoner at the breaking out of the late war; his spiritual
change or conversion during his sickness and other afflictions, and then
among a multitude of other particulars relating to the Indians, says:
“I had always a facility in learning languages and the pains I took
after my adoption to acquire theirs, with the proficiency I soon made in
it, ingratiated me a good deal with the Indians, so that in this third
year I found myself much respected. Old Canassatego; a warrior,
counsellor, and the chief man of our village, used to come frequently to
smoke and talk with me, while I worked at my new f business, and many of
the younger men would come and sit with him, pleased to hear our
conversations. As he soon saw I was curious on that head he took a good
deal of pains to instruct me in the principles of their eloquence, an
art (it may seem strange to say it but it is strictly true) carried much
higher among these savages than it is now in any part of Europe, as it
is their only polite art, as they practice it from their infancy, as
everything of consequence is transacted in councils, and all the force
of their government consists in persuasion. He would also often enquire
of me concerning our wars, history, customs, arts, etc., and sometimes
about our religious opinions. I then regretted that I had so unhappily
refused the advantage once in my power of acquiring a store of divine
knowledge under the pious instructions of Dr. Doddridge, which my
friends of all things wished, intending me for the ministry, but my mind
was extremely averse to it, and I had abruptly left him against their
advice, which obstinacy of mine was the beginning of my misfortunes. But
enough of that/* The writer then goes on to relate sundry conversations
he had at different times with the Indians on religious subjects
occasioned by his acquainting them with parts of our scripture history.
These we pass over, as containing little entertainment or information
except the follow -ing, by which we may learn how imperfect the Indian
ideas are of tiod, what partial notions they have of the creation, and
how widely different from ours their opinions are of those regulations
of commerce by which one nation proposes to make advantage to itself in
distressing the trade of others. The Europeans think such regulations
wise and good; the Indian it seems, the highest folly and wickedness.
“While I was musing in what manner best to explain this matter to his
understanding, Konnedohaga, the young warrior, took up the discourse,
and said: 1 You tell us that the great Manitta made all these things in
the first six days. I find we know some things that you do not know.
Your book does not tell you everything. At least if your Manitta made
all the things of your country in the first six days it was not so in
this Indian country, for some things were not made till many generations
after, and they were made by our Manitta’s daughter. I will tell you,
says he, how it happened, as I learned it when I last hunted among the
Oneidas. Nine Oneida warriors passing near a certain hill not far from
the head of the Sasquehanah saw a most beautiful young woman descend
naked from the clouds, and seat herself on the ground upon that hill.
Then they said, this is the great Manitta’s daughter; let us go to her,
welcome her into our country and present her some of our venison. They
gave her a fawn’s tongue broixed, which she eat, and, thanking them,
said: " Come to this place again after twelve moons and you will find
where I now sit some things you have never yet seen, and that will do
you good.’ So saying she put her hands on the ground, arose, went up
into the clouds and left them. They came accordingly after twelve moons
and found growing, where she had pressed the ground with her right hand,
corn where with her left hand beans and where her back parts had pressed
it, there grew tobacco/ At this origin of tobacco all the young Indians
laughed, but old Canassatego, reproving them, and the teller of the
story said, ‘You are a young man or you would not have told before this
white man such a story. It is a foolish Oneida tale. If you tell him
such tales what can you expect but to make him laugh at our Indian
stories as much as you sometimes do at his ? Hearken to me, I will tell
you and him all the true story of the beginning of this country and the
making of all things in it, such as I long since learnt it from my
mother, who had it from her mother, and so on backwards for a hundred
generations.
“When we sat silent a few minutes he said: ‘White man, hearken to me;
hear me Coseagon. You say there is but one great good Manitta. You know
of no more. If there were but one, how unhappy must he be without
friends, without companions, and without that equality in conversation
by which pleasure is mutually given and received. I tell you there are
more than a hundred of them; they live in the sun and in the moon; they
love one another as brethren; they visit and converse with each other,
and they sometimes visit though they do not often converse with us.
Every country has its great good Manitta who first peopled that country.
I am now going to. tell you how my country was made and peopled.
“Then raising his voice and entering into the council style and manner
of speaking and with that modulation, which I may call the quoting tone,
being what they use when repeating messages, treaties or anything that
has been said by others in former times, distant places, or preceding
councils; a tone so particular, that if you come into a council in the
middle of a speech you can tell whether the person speaking is
delivering his own sentiments or reciting those of another, this tone
having the same effect in their speeches and answering nearly the same
end, with our marginal inverted commas in writing, to distinguish
borrowed passages quoted as authorities; only that the Indians have
three differences in the quoting tone, none of which we have in writing,
viz., the approving accent, the disapproving accent, and the uncertain
or doubting, and that there is something measured or musical in all
these tones. I say, Canassatego, in the quoting or historical tone with
the approving accent and with an air of great authority and dignity,
went on with his account of the manner in which his country was made and
peopled.
“When our good Manitta raised Akanishionegy" out of the great waters he
said to his brethren, “How fine a country is this! I will make the red
men the best of men to enjoy it.” Then with five handfuls of red seeds
like the eggs of flies, did he strow the fertile fields of Onondaga.
Little worms came out of the seeds and penetrated the earth, where the
spirits who had never yet seen the light entered into and united with
them. Manitta watered the earth with his rain; the sun warmed it; the
worms with the spirits in them grew, putting forth little arms and legs
and moved the light earth that covered them. After nine moons they came
forth perfect boys and girls. Manitta covered them with his mantle of
warm purple cloud and nourished them with milk from his finger ends.
Nine summers did he nurse them, and nine summers more did he instruct
them how to live. In the meantime he had made for their use trees,
plants and animals of various kinds. Akanishionegy was covered with
woods and tilled with creatures. Then he assembled his children together
and said, (‘ Ye are five nations, for ye sprang each from a different
handful of the seed I sowed; but ye are all brethren, and I am your
father, for I made ye all; I have nursed and brought you up:—Mohocks, I
have made you bold and valiant, and see I give you corn for your food.
Oneidas, I have made you patient of pain and of hunger; the nuts and
fruits of the trees are yours. Sennekers, I have made you industrious
and active; beans do I give you for nourishment. Cayugas, I have made
you strong, friendly and generous; ground nuts and every root shall
refresh you. Ononaagoes, I have made you wise, just and eloquent;
squashes and grapes have I given you to eat and tobacco to smoke in the
council. The beasts, birds and fishes I have given to you all in common.
As I have loved and taken care of you all so do you love and take care
of one another. Communicate freely to each other the good things I have
given you, and learn to imitate each others virtues. I have made you the
best people in the world, and I give you the best country. You will
defend it from the invasion of other nations, from the children of other
Manittas, and keep possession of it for yourselves while the sun and
moon give light and the waters run in the rivers. This you shall do if
you observe my words. Spirits, I am now about to leave you. The bodies I
have given you will in time grow old and wear out, so that you will be
weary of them, or from various accidents they will become unfit for your
habitation and you will leave them. I cannot remain here always to give
you new ones.
“I have great affairs to mind in distant places, and I cannot again
attend so long to the nursing of children. I have enabled you,
therefore, among yourselves to produce new bodies; to supply the place
of old ones, that every one of you when he parts with his old habitation
may in due time find a new one and never wander longer than he choses
under the earth, deprived of the light of the sun.
“Nourish and instruct your children as I have nourished and instructed
you. Be just to all men and kind to strangers that come among you. So
shall you be happy and beloved by all, and I myself will sometimes visit
and assist you.” Saying this he wrapped himself in a bright cloud and
went like a swift arrow to the sun, where his brethren rejoiced at his
return. From thence he often looked at Akanishionegy; and, pointing,
showed with pleasure to his brothers the country he had formed and the
nations he had produced to inhabit it.
“Here the five nations lived long and happily, communicating freely to
each other as their wants required, all the good things that had been
given them, and generations had succeeded generations when the great
evil Manitta came among them and put evil thoughts into their hearts.
Then the Mohocks scud: "We abound in com which our brothers have not;
let us oblige them to give us a great deal of fruits, beans, roots,
squashes and tobacco for a very little com, so shall we live in idleness
and plenty while they labour and live hardly." And in the same manner
spoke the other nations. Hence arose discord, animosity and hatred,
insomuch that they were on the point of lifting the hatchet against each
other and miring the ground with brother’s blood. Their Father saw this
from the sun, and was angry with his children. A thick blue and red
cloud covered all the land, and he spoke to them in thunder. "Wretches,"
said he, " did I not freely give to each of you different kinds of good
things, and those in plenty, that each might have something in his power
to contribute to his brother’s happiness, and so increase the happiness
and strengthen the union of the whole; and do you now abuse those gifts
to oppress each other; and would one brother, to make himself in
imagination, more happy, make four brethren in reality more miserable!
Ye have become unworthy of the goodness I have shown you, and shall no
longer enjoy my favours. Then the sun of Akanishionegy gave forth
darkness instead of light, so that the day was darker than the night,
the rivers ran backwards to the mountains, and, with all their fish,
re-entered the fountains from whence they sprung, forsaking their
ancient beds and leaving dry the banks they used to water.
“The clouds withheld their rain, and carried it away to other regions.
The surface of the earth became dust; whirlwinds filled the air with it,
and every breathing creature was almost stifled; every green thing
withered ; the birds flew away; the beasts ran out of the country, and,
last of all, the afflicted people famished nearly to death, their dry
eyes not having even a tear left, departed sorrowing, and were scattered
among the neighbouring nations, begging everywhere for food from those
who despised them for their late wickedness to one another.
“Nine summers passed away, and their distress continued. Then the evil
spirit left them, for they no longer listened to his counsels; they
began mutually to feel and to pity one another’s misfortunes; they began
to love and to help each other. The nations among whom they were
scattered now began to esteem them, and offered to adopt and incorporate
them among themselves. But they said: ‘No; we are still a people, we
chose to continue a people; perhaps our great Manitta will restore us to
our country and we will then remember this your offered kindness.’ The
great Manitta seeing their hearts changed looked on them with
compassion. He spoke and the sun again gave light; the rivers came again
forth from the fountains, and ran rejoicing through the delighted
valleys; the clouds again showered on the thirsty earth; the trees and
plants renewed their verdure; the birds and beasts returned to the
forests, and the five nations, with glad and thankful hearts, went back
to repossess their ancient seats. From that time down to the present day
it has been an inviolable rule and custom among the nations, that every
brother is welcome to what a brother can spare of the good things which
the spirit has caused to spring for him out of the earth.'
“All the Indians applauded Canassatego, and said they had heard that
good story often, but never before so well repeated. Indeed, however
absurd and false in its facts, it was admirably expressed and delivered.
In my account of it I have been obliged to drop many of the figures,
which, being unusual to us, would require long explanations, and I must
own I think it scarce possible in our language (I am sure it is
impossible for me) to do Indian eloquence justice. Canassatego then made
some remarks himself on the story, and told us that the English and
French, though they called the Indians brothers, had long practiced the
same wickedness towards them, making everything dear that they exchanged
with them, and even the things they the English and French exchanged
with one another. Corlaer says he, first makes Onontiof pay dearer for
strouds and blankets; then Onontio makes Corlaer pay as much dearer for
beaver; what, at best, can either of them get by this but his own
inconvenience and the other's ill-will? But this is not all. It is for
these causes that the great spirit of the white people is now angry with
them, and has left them to lift the hatchet, brother agaiAst brother, to
destroy their own habitations and bring misery on both their countries.
“I could not let all this pass without modestly remarking that his
account of the beginning of things was subject to great uncertainty as
being trusted to memory only, from woman to woman through so many
generations, and might have been greatly altered, whereas the account I
gave them was written down by direction of the Great Spirit himself and
preserved carefully in a book which was never altered, but had ever
remained the same and was undoubtedly the truth. 1 Coseagon/ says
Canassatego, ‘ you are yet almost as rude as when you first came among
us. When young it seems you were not well taught; you did not learn the
civil behaviour of men. We excused you; it was the fault of your
instructors But why have you not more improved since you have long had
the opportunity from our example? You see I always believed your
stories, why do you not believe mine Alaguippy and the other Indians
kindly made some apology for me, saying I should be wiser in time, and
they concluded with an observation which they thought very polite and
respectful towards me, that my stories might be best for the white
people, but Indian stories were undoubtedly best for Indians.
“Now, it is well known that some who have before me been among these
Indians, have reported highly of their stories, as if there were
something super-excellent in them. I have, therefore, given this story
of theirs at full length, translated as well as I am able, and I can
faithfully assure my readers it is one, of their very best, by which may
be seen the miserable darkness these poor creatures labour under, and
how far inferior their best instructions do appear when compared with
the unerring oracles that we possess and the histories contained in
them.”
Alexander Henry’s adventures commence with his descent of the St.
Lawrence and his first experience of war with the conquest of Fort Levis
in September, 1760. In attempting to run the Cedar Rapids his boats were
upset and all his goods lost, he escaped with difficulty himself. With
the capitulation of Montreal, he saw that the opportunity of trading was
come, and, hurrying back to Albany, “where my commercial connections
were,” secured a fresh supply of goods. Winter overtook him at Fort
Levis, and he spent the season there disposing of his goods to the
garrison. His adventures on the journey between Fort Levis and Montreal
are such as we might expect from the first experience of a young man
among the stray Indians demoralized by the war movement of the time. It
was, however, when thus harassed and almost despairing of his life from
the threats of the Indians and the inclemency of the weather, that his
feet were directed to the house of a friendly Frenchman, who had
ventured into the Indian hunting grounds in the North-West, and who
captivated him with his stories of the fabulous wealth in furs to be
obtained there. As soon as it was possible after his arrival in
Montreal, he persuaded General Gage to give him permission to set out on
a fur-trading expedition, and after a hurried trip to Albany for fresh
supplies he started upon his journey, little thinking that it would be
nearly fifteen years before he would again see Montreal.
Under the French regime furs had been the principal object of commerce.
The trade, at first confined to the neighbourhood of the St. Lawrence
and the lower great lakes was extended by the enterprise of the
fur-traders, who carried on their operations in spite of the government,
to Michilimackinac and Lake Superior. The failure of the great French
companies, principally through mismanagement, left the path open to
those whom Masson calls the “Coureurs des Bois, those heroes of the
prairie and the forest, regular mixture of good and evil, who for long
furnished the heroes to the modem romances, extravagant by nature, at
the same time grave and gay, cruel and compassionate, as credulous as
superstitious, and always irreligious.” Two of these, Radisson and
Groseilliers, had in the seventeenth century been driven into the hands
of the English, and were instrumental in establishing the Hudson’s Bay
Company. The French Government were forced to adopt the system of
licensing, and authorized the establishment of fortified trading posts,
which were placed under officials charged with the oversight of large
districts. Prominent among these ,was Michilimackinac, which had grown
into importance as a convenient meeting place for the natives of the
lands bordered on Lake Huron, Lake Michigan and Lake Superior. From this
place, in 1731, the most adventurous of all the traders, M. La V^rendrye
and his sons, set out, and in the interval between this date and 1748,
had established a series of posts extending from the Grand Portaere to
the Forks of the Saskatchewan. There Rainy Lake, Fort St. Charles on the
Lake of the Woods, Fort Maurepas at the mouth of the Winnipeg River,
Fort Dauphin on the north-west, and Fort La Reine on the south side of
Lake Manitoba, Fort Rouge at the junction of the Assiniboine and Red
Rivers, Fort Bourbon on Cedar Lake, Fort Poskoyac on the Saskatchewan,
and Fort La Come at the junction of the north and south branches of the
same river. It only remained for M. de Niverville to plant Fort La
Jonqui&re at the foot of the Rocky Mountains to complete their march
westward, before the whole country passed under the dominion of England.
The conquest of Canada altered the whole character of the trade. Until
the country had settled down after the war few licenses were issued, but
soon the trade was made free from all government interference. Alexander
Henry was among the first to obtain permission, and, as soon as the
weather permitted, started for Michilimackinac, travelling by the
regular route of the Ottawa River and Lake Huron. Passing across this
lake he found that the Indians had not yet recognized the change of
government, and that it was necessary for him to disguise himself as a
Frenchman. Michilimackinac had been supplied with a small force of
English soldiers from Detroit, and was, with the exception of the small
post on Green Bay, the most westerly fortified position in the British
Dominion. This story, told by Henry, of his adventures in this place and
of his escape from the massacre has been frequently repeated. Parkman,
who depends on Henry for this portion of his “ Conspiracy of Pontiac,”
says: “The authenticity of this very interesting book has never been
questioned. Henry was living at Montreal as late as the year 1809. In
1797 he, with others, claimed, in virtue of Indian grants, large tracts
of land west of the River Cuyahoga, in the present State of Ohio. A
letter from him is extant, dated in April of that year, in which he
offers this land to the Connecticut Land Company at one-sixth of a
dollar an acre.” To a Frenchman he was again indebted for a new
introduction to the fur trade, and, in partnership with M. Cadotte, he
extended his enterprise to the shores of Lake Superior. The mining fever
which diverted his attention lasted only a short time, when he returned
to trading, and joined the band of quarrelsome traders who had already
made the Grand Portage the principal station in the North-West. From
Michilimackinac the furs had passed into the hands of the English
traders at Albany, advantage being taken of the ships sailing to
Niagara, but the leading spirits at the Grand Portage were Canadians,
and their furs reached Montreal by the Ottawa River. The English of New
York were hampered by lack of skilled labour, but the Canadian traders
found ready to their hand the French Canadians, the best canoe and bush
men in the world. Breaking off from the motley crowd at the Grand
Portage, Thomas Curry was the first Canadian to penetrate to the
Saskatchewan and his success prompted James Finlay to follow. The
Frobishers and Henry set out in the following year, going further north
than either of their predecessors. Here they came in contact with the
Hudson’s Bay Company, who were nettled at what they conceived was an
invasion of their rights, and by the determined manner in which these
free-traders settled down upon the regular routes of travel to their
forts and secured from the Indians the furs they were taking to the
agents of the company. The necessity for combination among these men to
enable them to cope with the great company was the preliminary step to a
more formal union, which ultimately became the great rival of the
Hudson’s Bay Company, and was known as the North-West Company.
Henry’s narrative concludes with the account of his visit to the
Assiniboines on the great prairie, of the success of their expedition to
the Churchill River, and of their return to Montreal in 1776.
From this date we lose the benefit of the author’s guidance, but in the
Canadian Magazine for April and May, 1824, we have a short biography,
written by a friend, and published during the month in which he died.
“A character such as Mr. Henry could not long remain in obscurity; his
arrival in Montreal, after an absence during which he suffered so much
and encountered so many difficulties, soon made him an object of public
notoriety, and introduced him personally to the first circles in the
society at the time. Having signified his intention of visiting England,
he found many friends ready to furnish him with introductory letters,
and of whose offers he in some cases availed himself. In his visit to
Europe it was his design to make a tour to France, and among others, he
was furnished by M. St. Luc la Corne, then in this country, with letters
to his brother, the celebrated Abbd La Come, in France. With these
documents, he sailed for England in the first instance, in the year
1776; from thence he afterwards went to France, where he met a most
flattering reception from the Abb6, and being by his influence
introduced to court, was received .with such marks of condescension as
made an impression upon his mind which was never eradicated. In
particular, the remembrance of the attention which he received from the
unfortunate Marie Antoinette was fresh in his memory, and mentioned by
him only a very few days before his death.
“It ought to be mentioned, as a just tribute to Mr. Henry’s talents for
attentive and correct observation, that previously to his departure for
England, he presented Lord Dorchester, then Governor of Canada, with a
chart of such parts of the Indian territory as he had travelled through;
and the accuracy of this chart has been since confirmed in almost every
particular, by the future surveys of that country which have since been
made.
“But neither the kind feelings evinced towards Mr. Henry on his arrival
in England, nor the hospitable reception he met with from many
respectable characters to whom he carried letters, could induce him to
remain there. A life of inactive pleasure, or even of tranquil
enjoyment, was not suitable to a mind formed as his was. He returned to
Canada in the spring of 1777, and after revisiting the Indian country,
he made a second voyage across the Atlantic in the fall of the same
year. The third and last visit he paid to Great Britain was in the year
1780, from whence he returned to Montreal in 1781. From this period his
life presents a scene of less diversity, for although he still continued
to trade with the Indians, he contrived to carry on his business through
the medium of clerks, whom he sent to the different posts in that
country in his stead, while he himself fixed his residence in Montreal.
‘‘During his life he had been several times subjected to heavy pecuniary
losses, from various casualties incident to the trade he was engaged in;
he had, in fact, realized at different times what might be considered a
handsome fortune, and been frequently deprived of it by some untoward
accident or other. At last his indefatigable perseverance triumphed and
reaped its due reward, for at the time when he left off his joumies to
the Indian country, he was possessed of a handsome competency; and soon
after getting married, he settled to enjoy it in the bosom of his family
and amidst a circle of highly respectable friends.
“The method in which he now carried on his Indian trade necessarily
obliged him to engage a number of young men as clerks. Some of these, we
believe, are still alive, and can bear testimony to the kind and
honourable treatment which they experienced at his hand; and who still
retain a grateful sense of the advantages they reaped from his extensive
experience in this trade.
“For some years subsequent to 1781 we find Mr. Henry, in addition to his
pursuits in the fur trade, carrying on business as a general merchant in
Montreal. How long he continued to carry on the two occupations is not
certain, but he ultimately disposed of his privileges in the Indian
country to the North-West Company, and resigning the active department
of the business to them, became a dormant partner in that firm, where he
continued till 1796. Having disposed of his share in this establishment,
he now relinquished all connection with the Indian trade, and during the
rest of his life devoted his whole attention to the business of a
general merchant.
“Mr. Henry's high character for correctness, and his punctuality in
business soon secured to him the confidence and esteem of a wide circle
of correspondents. His business increasing beyond what one individual
could attend to, he took an old acquaintance and tried friend into
partnership with him, about twenty-five years before his death, which
allowed a relaxation from the more arduous duties of business, suitable
for his advanced age. To his well-known talents as a merchant and his
firmly established character for integrity he was indebted for his
appointment as King’s Auctioneer for the District of Montreal, a
situation which he received in 1812 and retained during the remainder of
his days.
“After spending a life exposed to such trials, hardships and
vicissitudes as we have noticed in the course of this memoir, and which
nothing but a more than usual vigour of constitution could have
protracted for so long a period, Mr. Henry died in Montreal on April
4th, 1824. The close of his existence farther indicated the strength of
his constitution: for some months previous to his death his friends had
observed an approaching debility of frame, which daily increased, till
at last he sunk under no specific disease, but from a general decay of
nature, in the eighty-fifth year of his age.
“After what has been already stated, little more is required to give the
attentive reader an idea of the prominent parts of Mr. Henry’s
character. He seemed by nature every way formed for the arduous duties
of the life he had led. To a mind whose chief attributes were energy,
perseverance and determined courage, suitable for the accomplishment of
any enterprise to which danger or difficulty was attached, Mr. Henry
joined a body formed for the endurance of fatigue and capable of great
exertion He was about the middle size, distinguished by an easy and
dignified deportment, and a symetry of shape, which attracted the notice
of both the savage and the civilized, for among the Indian nations he
went by the epithet of “the handsome Englishman,” and it may be
remarked, as a proof that the idea that manly beauty is the same among
all nations, for on his appearance at the court of France, he was known
by the same distinctive appellation. Of his talents, the best estimate
may be formed by a perusal of his writings, which bear unequivocal
testimony of his having been a man of attentive observation. His manners
bespoke a candid, open disposition, and formed a passport to an
acquaintance immediately on being introduced to him. All these, combined
with his social habits, extensive information, and the agreeable method
in which he could convey a description of whatever he had seen, from the
possession of colloquial talents of the first rate, drew around him a
number of friends whose sincere esteem he possessed to the hour of his
death.”
We get occasional glimpses of Henry between 1777 and 1733, while he was
still engaged in the fur trade, in the Canadian Archives and the
Montreal Gazette, which are quite in accordance with the high character
given him. In 1785 he is one of the leading merchants of Montreal who
presented a farewell address to the late Acting-Govemor, Hon. Henry
Hamilton, and in January, 1787, signs an address of thanks to certain
merchants of Montreal, passed at a meeting held at the Recollets
Convent. We meet here also, for the first time, the signature of
Alexander Henry, Jr. In August of the same year we find him signing a
memorial from the heads of the General Society at Michilimackinac.
Complaints had been made as to the conduct of Mr. Dease, the
superintendent of Indian affairs, and Mr. Ainse, the interpreter, and
Lord Dorchester appointed a commission in 1788 to investigate the
charges, composed of three military officers and two merchants, of whom
Mr. Henry was one. In 1789 he is back in Montreal and signs an address
of welcome to the loyalist Bishop of Nova Scotia, Charles Inglis, on his
first visit to Montreal. One of the difficulties which continually
annoyed the furtraders was the uncertainty about the character of their
men, to whom so much was entrusted, and in 1789, Henry, with ten other
firms, agrees “not to employ any voyageur unless he produced a
certificate from his cur.” His military duties seem also to have been
attended to, for His Excellency the Governor grants him the same year
his commission as lieutenant. In 1790 he is back in Michilimackinac
attending the commission to which he had been appointed in 1788,
evidently displeased at its slow progress, for “Messrs. William Grant
and Henry, traders, belonging to the General Partnership, who were on
the Board, said publicly that the proofs took too long—that they should
be trading and not holding such enquiries—that they had pressing
business elsewhere.” In May, 1791, he publishes an announcement that
“The subscriber being about to quit the Province for some months,
requests those who may have contract or other engagements with him, to
address themselves to Messrs. McTavish, Frobisher and Company, with whom
he leaves the management of his affairs during his absence.—Alexander
Henry.” In 1792 he is one of those signing the address to Sir John
Johnson on his departure, and in the following year a subscriber to the
Voyageur's Relief Fund. Long after he left the fur trade, and was acting
as King's Auctioneer, an incident occurred which illustrates the customs
troubles of early days. The Montreal Herald, of March, 1812, says: “On
the evening of Saturday or Sunday last, a gang of lawless villains
forcibly broke into the store of Alexander Henry, Esq., and robbed it of
thirty-four chests of tea, which had been formerly seized by the Custom
House officials as smuggled property. When they reached the partition
dividing the back from the front of the store they bored an upper and
lower line of holes with an auger, exactly parallel, driving in the
intermediate space, thus making room for a chest of tea. From the nature
of the work it must have taken a dozen experienced, hardy, and
villainous rogues to complete the atrocious task.” Henry advertised,
offering a reward of $200 and a promising to keep the informer’s name
secret. Whether he succeeded in getting it back is not stated We learn
from “Doige’s Alphabetical List of Merchants of Montreal” that Messrs.
Henry & Bethune occupied, in 1823, No. 129 St. Paul Street. Mr. Bethune
was a nephew of Henry’s, and resided with him at 14 St. Urbain Street.
Alexander Henry’s “Travels and Adventures” were published in New York in
1807, and seem to have attracted little attention. They appear to have
been compiled from “details from time to time committed to paper during
his wanderings.” The earlier portion shows a want of correctness in the
distances mentioned, which is the more surprising when we consider that
he had "Sir Alexander Mackenzie’s Travels” in his hands for some years,
and makes quotations from it. The first part of this book, containing a
history of the Canadian fur trade, said to have been written by Roderick
Mackenzie, has detailed measurements of the distances and of the
obstructions to navigation between Montreal and Athabasca. It contains
no reference to Henry, though the expedition to the Saskatchewan, in
which Henry took part, is mentioned. Henry is constantly confusing
leagues and miles, sometimes using miles when leagues would be correct,
and sometimes the reverse. In Chapter II., page 24, he loses a whole
month, writing July instead of August. But these blemishes are readily
overlooked in the face of the correctness of his description and clear,
simple, Defoe-like style. We look in vain for a rival in these respects.
^ With only one other American traveller of his century can he be
compared—Jonathan Carver—whose narrative will always be read as the
soldierly record of the earliest experience of an Englishman in that
portion of the continent immediately to the south of the country
described by Henry, but wanting that simplicity of style which is the
charm of Henry's book. £ln addition to which Henry covered greater
distances, described more dangerous adventures, and displayed a greater
familiaritt with the manners and customs of the savage people whom he
visited. That he dedicated' his book to Sir Joseph Banks would imply
that he had met that friend .of discoverers during one of his visits to
England, and that a common love of natural history and ethnology had
drawn them together.
Henry's eldest son, William, born about 1783, inherited the adventurous
spirit of his father. Entering the service of the North-West Company as
a clerk, he was stationed from 1801 to 1809 at different posts in whajb
is now the Province of Manitoba, part of his time being spent with his
cousin, Alexander Henry, Jr. While in a camp of Assiniboines he barely
escaped being stabbed by a drunken Saulteur. In 1810 he was in charge of
the North-West Company's post at Cumberland House, and in the following
year was on the Athabasca River, where he established a new post which
was marked on the maps as Henry's House, though it was destroyed after
an existence of only two or three years. It stood at the junction of the
Miette River with the Athabasca facing the Yellowhead Pass, and was the
most southerly post on the latter river. Its site was visited by
Franchfere in 1814, and Ross Cox in 1817. From thence he was removed
westward to the post on the Williamette River (Oregon), where he
remained in charge until 1816. Orders from Canada caused him to return
to Fort William on Lake Superior, and in 1817 he was sent to Lesser
Slave Lake. At the time of the amalgamation of the two fur companies he
returned to Montreal and became a surveyor and civil engineer. Here he
married the sister of Mr. John Felton. About 1848 he removed to the town
of Newmarket, thirty miles north of Toronto and continued there his
profession of land surveyor. He died about 1864. The portrait which
appears on the opposite page is reproduced from a daguerreotype taken
about 1855. During his residence in the Rocky Mountains, among other
stirring adventures, he en> countered a grizzly bear, which tore off his
scalp, before he was rescued by an Indian. He also carried to his grave
the marks of knife wounds received at different times in quarrels with
the Indians. His brother-in-law, John Felton, who lived for the latter
part of his life near Sherbrooke, Province of Quebec, had been signal
midshipman on Nelson's flagship, the Victory, at the battle of
Trafalgar, and had been present also at the battle of Copenhagen, for
both of which engagements he received medals. At the blockade of
Guadalope, West Indies, he was the officer of the watch on board the
Curieux, sloop-of-war, when she struck a rock and was wrecked. The
court-martial which was held, acted hastily it was felt, in finding
that, “though the wreck was caused by circumstances beyond his control,
he should be dismissed the service." During the visit of the Prince of
Wales to Canada, His Royal Highness, when in Sherbrooke, sent for
Felton, and to the great satisfaction of his neighbours and friends
received him with the greatest cordiality, and exercised the prerogative
delegated by the Queen, by restoring him to the position he had lost.
Alexander, the second son, also entered the service of the North-West
Company, but does not appear to have distinguished himself. From George
Keith’s despatch to Roderick Mackenzie, from the Mackenzie River
Department, we learn of his end. “Sorry I am to add that the late Mr.
Alexander Henry with four men and some women and children suffered an
untimely and barbarous fate, all having been most cruelly murdered by a
strong party of natives of that post (Fort Nelson, Liard River)."
Julia, the third child and only daughter, died unmarried. Of the
children of William, the eldest named after his father, nothing is
known, but the second son, Charles, preserved the family restlessness of
disposition:. He was bornin Montreal in 1832 and taken to Newmarket,
when the family removed. In his thirteenth year he ran away from home,
making his way to the seaboard, and shipped before the mast in a
merchant vessel. Two years after, he joined a whaler, cruising about for
four years. The ship “Catherine,” in which he was at the time, was
wrecked on the Island of Hawaii, only three of the crew reaching shore,
one of whom was Charles, who floated into safety on a hencoop. One of
the three commenced almost immediately to fight with the natives and was
killed, but the two survivors, after trial before the tribal council,
were permitted to stay on the island. They both took native wives, and
built themselves huts. At the end of three months the arrival of a
vessel in the harbour afforded them an opportunity of escaping, which
they did, by stealing a canoe. Charles then joined the American navy,
was in service during the Mexican war, and was paid off in 1857. He
frequently applied for a pension but was never granted one. He next
turns up as a driver of a mule wagon for the American Government at Fort
Snelling. In 1862 he returned to Canada and spent the remainder of his
days in Barrie, on Lake Simcoe, about sixty miles north of Toronto and
some thirty miles north of his old home at Newmarket. He died in June,
1897, in somewhat reduced circumstances Julia, the third child, married
B. W. Murray, Esq., accountant of the Supreme Court, Ontario, and
resides in Toronto.
Among the most active opponents of the Hudson's Bay Company immediately
before the union of the two companies, when the warfare was keenest, we
meet with the name of Robert Henry. It occurs in the papers published by
Parliament “relating to the Red River settlement.” Among the despatches
captured by the Hudson’s Bay Company was one from Robert Henry, dated
May 22nd, 1816, addressed to his uncle, Alexander Henry, in which the
determination of the employees of the North-West Company to tight their
opponents is openly expressed, and the document is quoted by the
Hudson’s Bay Company as showing the murderous character of the Canadian
traders. This Robert Henry was an adopted nephew who, in 1817, retired
from the fur-trade, settling down in the town of Cobourg, on Lake
Ontario, where he pursued for many years the business of banking, and
died there in 1859, aged 81 years.
In this new edition all the typographical peculiarities of punctuation
and capitals have been preserved, so that it is almost a fac-simile of
the original. No omissions or alterations have been made in the text.
The author’s spelling of proper names has been retained throughout. His
notes are indicated by the ordinary symbols, *, f, etc., and the
editor’s additional notes by the Arabic numerals. The illustrations of
the warehouse occupied by Alexander Henry, which was situated upon the
north-west comer of St. Paul and St. Nicholas streets, Montreal, show it
as it appeared before its destruction by fire on January 23rd, 1901. The
building was originally erected about 1670, by Jean Baptiste Migeon,
agent for the West India Company, as a warehouse for furs and goods for
the Indian country. Here La Salle received his supplies for his
expedition to the Mississippi. In 1780 it was purchased by Henry for the
storage of furs, and continued to be occupied for this purpose until its
destruction. Its last proprietor was Mr. James Coristine, who says: “It
had been much changed in thirty-five years. It was two-storied, with a
high cellar and a gabled roof, with large dormer windows, covered with
white tin. The entrance on the north side was by way of a turret, with
winding stone steps, giving access to the upper stories. The material in
the building was of surface stone, unquarried, and it was undoubtedly
one of the first buildings erected in Montreal.” The main room on the
ground floor, shown in the upper illustration, was of great solidity,
the ceiling being nearly six feet thick, and the openings capable of
being shut, so as to exclude all the light.
The editor takes this opportunity of expressing his thanks to Mr. A. F.
Hunter, Barrie, Ont., for his valuable notes and suggestions; to Mr. W.
D. Lighthall, Westmount, Montreal, for photographs; and to Mr. C. C.
James, Deputy Minister of Agriculture, for numerous notes.
James Bain.
Download
Travels & Adventures here in
pdf format |