For many years the
present City of Toronto methodistically stood in connexion with the
Yonge Street Circuit, and appeared on the Minutes, not even as York and
Yonge Street, but as '‘Yonge Street and York." It was so, we know, in
1823-4, 1824-5, and in 1825-6; in 1826-7 it was reversed, and York
stood first. In 1827-8, it became an independent station. During the
whole time, from 1823 to 1827, the Yonge Street preachers, two in
number, came each only once a month. There Were two Sabbaths in every
four which they did not supply. Sometimes this defect was remedied by the
two Alcaster preachers, coming each once a month. In 1823, these were
the Rev. David Culp, and towards the latter part of the year, Joseph
Messmore, then a young man supplying under the direction of the
Presiding Elder. We heard some of his first sermons, and no ill
commencement they were to a long course of laborious efforts in his
Master’s cause. The arrangement referred to stood also for the following
year. Rut very frequently the alternate Sabbath to that on which the Yonge Street ministers in there, were supplied by local and located
preacher The Rev. David Youmans, as we have already seen, was one of the
latter. Mr. Robert Bosfield, a profound and masterly sermonizer, but
very slow of speech, was one of the former. !But there was yet another,
a great favourite with all, whom we shall make the special subject of
the present sketch.
"He was, we believe, a native of Canada,
but of German extraction, as both his family and baptismal name
unmistakably indicated. He resided in the woods of Scarborough. He had
no advantages of education, beyond what the country parts of Canada
afforded fifty years ago: but he was a man of genius for all that. This
he showed, we are told, by some very clever poetical effusions. During
the war of 1812, he was a very active and enthusiastic militiaman, and
composed several patriotic songs. One, of a military character, ascribed
to him, we often heard sung in our boyhood, and it struck us as very
clever. He was naturally a man of activity and daring. Traditions of his
personal exploits, showing his ability and strength, were often recited
to the writer. He was then unconverted, and remained in that state until
he was twenty-nine years old. Then, an alarming providence, which took
away one of his companions at “a raising,” aroused him from the sleep of
sin. Happily the voice of God’s messengers in the wilderness, crying,
“Prepare ye the way of the Lord!” was there, as also, the voice of the
turtle was heard In the land. His sin-sick soul drank in the balmy sound
and was at once made whole.
He soon began to exhort
and preach; nor did the trumpet give any uncertain sound. The preachers
knew and appreciated him. They had to be absent from the town a Sabbath
at a camp-meeting, and our hero was proposed by them as a supply. To
this the richest man in the Society, an old Scotch gentleman, who did
not believe in camp-meetings, and did not go to them, made strong
objections. He was to stay at home, and wanted a respectable preacher in
the pulpit, if possible but the proposed supply was a poor man who had
to labour for his living, and had been in town only a few days before,
with a load of shingles, barefooted. To have such a man, the sturdy Scot
thought would not do at all. But there was no other supply; and,
fortunately, the poor man “made a raise” of a pair of shoes before
Sunday, and his good wife otherwise "fixed him up,” making his “auld
claise to look almaist as weel as new.” On Sabbath morning, in he came,
and succeeded to admiration. And the first news Mr. C. had to tell the
ministers, on their return was, what two excellent sermons Brother F.
had preached. He was thenceforth in great request in the town, and none
of the travelling preachers stood higher.
We well remember our
first sight of him. We had been only a few weeks trying to serve God,
but long enough to have read the "Life of Wesley, by Coke and Moore,”
and a volume of the "Lives of the Early Methodist Preachers.” We went on
the morning referred to, as was our wont, at an early hour, to the
meeting house. The congregation had pretty much all assembled before any
preacher made his appearance. They had begun to look inquiringly at each
other, when a broad, heavy, masculine-looking man, with plain but
agreeable features, and a sunburnt, beardless face— perhaps thirty-four
years of age—entered, dressed in a well-worn suit of dark-coloured
homespun—cut-away coat—and an oaten-straw hat in his hand. I felt to
love him at once. He was the beau ideal of one of the early rustic lay
preachers, and might have answered to represent the meek but
stout-hearted John Nelson himself. And, oh, what a delightful service we
had that morning! Our preacher was modest, but composed. His voice was
pleasant, and his elocution, or “delivery,” as we used to call it, good.
An impressive reader was he. Then, such a sermon! So clear, methodical,
consecutive, rememberable, and sweetly evangelical. His text was, “Fear
not, little flock, for it is your father’s good pleasure to give you the
kingdom.” He treated it in a way that went to our hearts. To this day we
can easily remember his texts and the way he treated them. He was an
easy, natural, ingenious sermonizer, The secret of his amplification
was, his always noticing what his text implied as well as expressed.
We must recite another
incident of our friend and the town pulpit. At that time there were two
well-educated gentlemen, natives of England, who sometimes came to the
"Old Framed Meeting-House.” The first was the son of a Wesleyan
Minister, and had been classically trained at Kingswood school—had been
a popular local preacher himself, but now seldom officiated, and wore
his religion pretty loosely around him. His connection with Methodism
ended with the removal of the British Missionaries about 1820. The
other, was a man of respectable connexions, the brother of an English
Church Clergyman, and a sincere enquirer after truth, who ultimately
became a Baptist. He was very partial to one of our circuit Ministers in
1825-6, during which year the following scene is laid. We remember the
morning well; and of seeing him in the chapel, and the rest that
occurred. The Scarborough brother supplied that morning. He was dressed
in a heavy suit of home-made; and entered with a coarse wool hat in his
hand, the binding around the rim of which was in ringlets. His nether
extremities were cased in a large, heavy pair of cowhide boots, which
were whole enough, only that one of them was minus its heel-leathers.
This made his heavy tramp somewhat unequal, and give his walk a
“wabbling” appearance. We observed that Mr. W—m looked fidgetty at the
first, but that he staid out the service. Some day that week the
following colloquy took place in the streets of “Little York.” Two
gentlemen meet and exchange the usual greetings.
Mr. F—n.—“Where were
you last Sunday?”
Mr. W—M.—"I was at the
Methodist Chapel. I went expecting to hear Mr. R—n. There was no
preacher in when I arrived, but I had not been seated long when a great,
rough lump of a man came in dressed in home-spun. I was disappointed and
disgusted, and, if it had not been for the looks of it, I should have
taken my hat and left. But I staid; and I was glad I did. He gave us a
beautiful sermon. Sir, he opened up the Scriptures rightly.”
His text that day was
the words of Christ: “If any man serve me, let him follow me; and where
I am there shall my servants be: if any man serve me, him will my Father
honor.” He truly did open this passage of Scripture “rightly.” Many of
his texts and his mode of treating them, after the lapse of thirty-four
or five years are still fresh in our own recollection.
He was our only
preceptor in Homiletics. Some reverses had confined him for a time to
the city limits, where he was fain to support himself by making the
coarser kind of shoes. We had been called out on to a neighbouring
circuit, about this time. One day—the only spare one we had in four
weeks, we rode into town to see our friends but we never failed to go
and see this preaching Crispin. We usually told him of all the new texts
we had taken during the month, and how we had handled them; as also what
other texts we had thought of, but did not know how to extract their
sweets. He gave us his judgment on the skeletons we had made, always
suggesting some real improvement; while he taught us how to analyze
those passages which we had feared to broach. Talk of Theological
Schools, and Professors of Homiletics— no man understood sermonizing
better than that wax-begrimed child of adversity. And never did I spend
happier or more profitable hours' than in that unfinished loft, by that
lowly shoe-bench. Our seasons of delightful communion were always
concluded with prayer.
Subsequently, this good
man—for he was a sanctified soul— adjusted his affairs, and went into
the work as a “hired local preacher,” being too old and deficient in
learning to enter in the usual way. After some years, however, the rule
was dispensed with in his case, in view of his actual preaching
abilities and successful labors, and he was made a member of the
Conference. After laboring for twenty years upon circuits he is now for
several years a Superanuate in retirement, not far from the scenes of
his early labors. Scores of more sprightly and better educated men have
entered the ministry and thrown those of his School into the shade ; yet
few can think how useful they were in their day, and how really capable
they were as preachers. Our hero’s general knowledge was not very
extensive; the theme of his delighted conversations, therefore, usually
was religion and preaching. He might have found it hard to keep up with
all our connexional improvements, and may have lacked a little in that
case as a Superintendent: yet a preacher he was, both in the pulpit and
by the fire side— in the latter he particularly excelled.
Though our subject is
not dead, we are anxious to have his name upon our pages; and hope he
will pardon us for bringing Cornelius Flumerfelt out of his obscurity
and making him to figure as One of Our Supplies, thirty-five years ago,
in the “Old Framed Meeting House.” |